*************
The following message is relayed to you by [email protected]
************
Hi David,
I agree and therefore my reference so that one and all have a better
idea of LRH's work and how he was possibly able to do much of it.
Paul/Level 5 in progress (among other things)
On Aug 8, 2012, at 8:22 AM, [email protected] wrote:
There is something wrong with this list soft ware.
It does not stick to form.
When I received it, it wasn't as I had sent it.
It landed up at the very bottom of the entire email.
Here it is again:
Aleister Crowley: The Other Loch Ness Monste
On the other hand you can't blame Hubbard for hanging out with bad
people or bad actors, like Crowley. There is nothing wrong with
someone like Hubbard checking out such stuff.
(of which there are people, who label Hubbard as evil or having
evil intentions just for hanging out with Crowley, quite possibly
for researching the big picture)
Hubbard checked out all sides of the spectrum.
Haven't we all checked out things, that we eventually realized that
it was not our cup of tea.
How else do you learn between right and wrong?
You learn the stove is hot by touching it and getting burnt.
So my point is that you have to see this in proper context.
Such research is part of completing the cycle of learning,
knowing and understanding.
David
_______________________________________________
Trom mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.newciv.org/mailman/listinfo/trom
