************* The following message is relayed to you by [email protected] ************
Paul,
(and everyone else on this list). Get out your Handbook for Preclears and read it very slowly and get certainty on every sentence and every word and every idea. After four yrs of trial and error and study and research and evaluation it is my experience that the hand book for preclears is the best runway for TROM. Lock scanning, which is what the handbook is all about, has been more workable for me than time breaking. Furthermore, taking a bird on the wire viewpoint and doing it with hindsight, even the hand book could be given more runway and that runway would consist of some "Self Analysis" style processing. Sort of a mini SA to be a primer for the handbook for preclears, then get into TROM. This applies to at least L2 and L3. I haven't got enough understanding or rather more accurately, haven't given L4 and L5 sufficient effort, consideration and evaluation to make any qualified or useful comment on them. These subjects take a heck of a lot of work and time to develop. LRH said it took him 20 yrs to come up with the Handbook for Preclears. I also think it would be the best idea possible, for everyone to now go and carefully reread every scn book to get full certainty on each and everyone of them. I mean the basic texts. Not research volumes and such other data or related data. I haven't read them either. David On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 2:22 AM, Paul Tipon <[email protected]>wrote: > ************* > The following message is relayed to you by [email protected] > ************ > I cannot be as specific as you in your post but I do agree that Dennis in > his writings about TROM is only specific about his Tech and also does not > expound on it very much. There is a lot to know there which Dennis does > not even mention. > > Ron of course was very prolific and there is much to learn and know in his > writings. Up to the end of the St. Hill Briefing Course, Ron's work is > extremely good. That era was up to and including a lot of his work thru > 1966. There also is some good work beyond this date but it also marks > where Ron begins to go off track. > > And yes, TROM could be somewhat different, easier and better. As I have > said in the past Dennis contribution is his Tech of TimeBreaking and I > leave it at that. That is why I, in my posts like to fill in the gaps and > the missing data. TROM is an excellent procedure for solo Clearing but is > missing a lot of foundation and fundamentals. As most know, Dennis did not > provide a runway into TROM nor any Tech to prepare one to go into TROM > without hitting a bunch of the difficulties that one can get into. > > Paul/Level 5 in progress > > On Sep 27, 2012, at 5:00 AM, [email protected] wrote: > >> >> Paul, >> >> Thanks for posting that. >> >> It was an interesting read. >> >> >> But: >> >> >> I am doing Handbook for Preclears and I get the idea that Dennis did not >> read that book, or if he did he did not understand it or do it, or do it >> properly and as a result was glib on it. >> >> My point is that if Dennis read that book and understood it, TROM would >> be >> different and easier and better. >> >> David >> > > ______________________________**_________________ > Trom mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.newciv.org/**mailman/listinfo/trom<http://lists.newciv.org/mailman/listinfo/trom> >
_______________________________________________ Trom mailing list [email protected] http://lists.newciv.org/mailman/listinfo/trom
