************* The following message is relayed to you by [email protected] ************
Pete, According to the definition that Dennis gave us, these are not crossed because of complementary or opposing postulates, but because there are two different sets of postulates here. It's like mixing apples and oranges. That's why it's crossed-packaged. The only way that it could be not cross-packaged is to have 4 matched postulates in one set, like 4 matching tires on a car. To put 2 winter tires and 2 summer tires on a car is cross-packaging. Of course a properly formed set of 4 matching postulates contains both complementary and opposing postulates within the same set. But to say 'I want to eat an apple', and 'an orange wants to be eaten' is not a matched set; how could this be complementary, if an orange wants to be eaten, instead of the apple that you asked for. To say 'I want to eat an apple', and 'an apple wants to be eaten' would be a complementary pair. To say 'I want to eat an apple', and 'an apple doesn't want to be eaten' would be opposing postulates within the same matching 4 postulate set. All of the sets that you gave are mismatched, and therefore cross-packaged. Opposing or complementary is not part of the definition of cross-packaged; the same subject matter or not is part of the definition. Apples with apples, and oranges with oranges. A spiritual being that is being only male or female is cross-packaged because that being only has 2 out of 4 postulates, which isn't a full set. A spiritual being may have had a male body in one lifetime, and a female body in another lifetime, so therefore the being has to have all 4 postulates to function properly, and understand the other sex's viewpoint. Thanks, Aarre
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 7:46 PM, Pete McLaughlin < [email protected]> wrote: > ************* > The following message is relayed to you by [email protected] > ************ > > OK Aarre > Here are your examples plugged into the games matrix. they show that if 1. > and 3 are not complementary postulates that the package is crossed. > > Keep on TROMing > Pete > > > I have to have sex with him so that he'll marry me. > > 1. to be married 3. must be sexed > 2. to not be marred 4. to not be sexed > > I have to show my virility by giving her a good session in bed. > > 1. masculinity 3. satisfied girl > 2. no masculinity 4. unsatisfied girl > > I'll look prettier to others if I wear this sexy dress. > > 1. sexy 3. wear dress > 2. not sexy 4. not wear dress > > > I can't wear those orange pants, because they're such a 'gay' colour ! > > 1. homosexuality 3. gay colour > 2. not homosexual 4. no gay colour > > I'll be the life of the party if I tell them how often 'I scored'. > > 1. popular 3. had sex > 2. not popular 4. not had sex > > I can't have sex with him in the first two dates, or he'll think that I'm > a whore. > > 1. sex too soon 3. whore > 2. not sex to soon 4. not whore > > To sex vs. To be sexy. (definitely a cross packaging). > > 1. to sex 3. to be sexy > 2. to not sex 4. to not be sexy > > > To sex and to be sexed vs. to sensually stimulate and to be sensually > stimulated. > > 1. to sex 3. to sensually stimulate > 2. to not sex 4. to not sensually stimulate > > 1. to be sexed 3. to be sensually stimulated > 2. to not be sexed 4. to not be sensually stimulated > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Trom mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.newciv.org/mailman/listinfo/trom > >
_______________________________________________ Trom mailing list [email protected] http://lists.newciv.org/mailman/listinfo/trom
