*************
The following message is relayed to you by [email protected]
************
Hi Roberto
Line 1A of the Postulate Failure Chart is the point of overwhelm for self at
leg 4 of the to sex goals package in the case you site.
At overwhelm leg 4 is in a game loss and a complementary postulate has been
forced upon leg 4 by leg 1.
Your observation is correct and the charts are correct there. Thank you for
checking them, i am not perfect and more quality control is happily accepted.
Sincerely
Pete
>________________________________
> From: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
>To: 'The Resolution of Mind list' <[email protected]>
>Sent: Saturday, February 9, 2013 8:31 AM
>Subject: Re: [TROM1] RE Cross-Packaging
>
>*************
>The following message is relayed to you by [email protected]
>************
>
>
>Hello Pete
>
>I did not go through the charts you provided, but already line 1 of
>the Sex-Chart is contrary to my understanding.
>
>Line 1 reads:
>Self: Must be sexed – Other: Must sex. = Forced to be sexed.
>
>Must be sexed and must sex are complimentary, aren't they?
>
>Well, maybe I habe an MU – no wonder my wife left me...
>
>Regards
>Roberto
>
>
>
>Von:Pete McLaughlin [mailto:[email protected]]
>Gesendet: Sonntag, 27. Januar 2013 04:20
>An: Colleen K. Peltomaa; TROM
>Betreff: Re: [TROM1] RE Cross-Packaging
>
>Hi Colleen and thanks
>
>a Junior Goals Package is set up on the postulate failure chart just like the
>to know postulate chart but subsitiuting to sex or whatever junior goal you
>want for to know. the Junior Goals are verbs or action words or doingnesses.
>
>see the attached files
>
>
>The Junior Universes are very different. these are nouns which is to say
>objects which have an existence like a cat or a brick so they are added to the
>to know goals package to be erased from the mind as an object or an existence.
>
>see the attached file for a dress
>
>
>>
>>________________________________
>>
>>From:Colleen K. Peltomaa <[email protected]>
>>To: Pete McLaughlin <[email protected]>
>>Sent: Saturday, January 26, 2013 4:59 PM
>>Subject: RE Cross-Packaging
>>
>>Hi, Pete, I was trying to stay out of the discussion about cross-packaging,
>>but Aarre kept talking about it, so I pulled all references to
>>cross-packaging from the Manual and put them into one document.
>>
>>
>>One MU I got cleared up for myself is that it does seem that Dennis does use
>>junior packages and junior universes to mean the same thing in some places.
>>
>>I also see that if someone thinks male and female are opposing goals then he
>>might as well be cross-packaging, however I can't get into the algebra of it
>>at this time, just a hunch.
>>
>>love,
>>colleen
>>
>_______________________________________________
>Trom mailing list
>[email protected]
>http://lists.newciv.org/mailman/listinfo/trom
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
Trom mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.newciv.org/mailman/listinfo/trom
