************* The following message is relayed to you by trom@lists.newciv.org ************
Hello Jurgen
>> 2. The postulate taking the effect out of existence, and the postulate that >> it shall be made not-known. I think you are right that this "made" is wrong. Because: "Taking the effect out of existence" is "self". "Be not known" is "others". But: "Be made not known" would also be "self" so we would get "self to self". My understanding only. However, in my opinion (which doesn't seem to have many friends here) we should not change the manual itself but collect errors – or what we think are errors – in an additional errata sheet provided together with the original manuscript. Nothing seems to be wrong with correcting obvious mistakes. But somewhere along the line, sooner later, inevitably (Murphy's Law), something that was correct will be changed into something wrong. And on and on and on, and someday the workability is lost. >> Bringing something into existence equals the postulate ‘shall be made >> known’ or ‘make known’. >> Taking something out of existence equals the postulate ‘shall be made not >> known’ or ‘make not known’. In this 2 examples (from you, not the manual) I think "shall be made known" and "shall be made not known" do not fit well, because they lack the twin postulate structure. "Make known" and "make not known" do have the twin postulate structure. Regards Roberto Von: Jurgen Kluft [mailto:jurgen_t...@hotmail.com] Gesendet: Donnerstag, 14. Februar 2013 03:23 An: The Resolution of Mind list Betreff: [TROM1] Manual: mistake Hi Trommers, I am reading the manual again ( 😊 again) and on every sentence I let the whole thing sink in. When doing this I came to a possible error and I would like to raise this point in the manual that, I think, is a (quite serious) mistake. It is about a passage in the Chapter ‘Theory’: “ The four basic actions of life each have a twin postulate structure: 1. The postulate bringing the effect into existence, and the postulate that it shall be known. 2. The postulate taking the effect out of existence, and the postulate that it shall be made not-known. 3. The postulate to know the effect and the postulate that it shall be made known. 4. The postulate to not-know the effect and the postulate that it shall be made not-known. “ The 2nd statement at the end states ‘that it shall be made not-known’. It is of my understanding that the word ‘made’ should be removed. Bringing something into existence equals the postulate ‘shall be made known’ or ‘make known’. Taking something out of existence equals the postulate ‘shall be made not known’ or ‘make not known’. We can thus abbreviate the above four points: 1. Make known - Know 2. Make not known - Not know 3. Know - Make known (1. from Other) 4. Not know - Make not known (2. from Other) And that is correct according to the next bullet list in the manual: “ SELF OTHERS 1. Make known. 2. Make not-known 3. Know. 4. Not-know. Know. Not-know. Make known. Make not-known. “ Can anyone confirm this? Thank you. -Jurgen
_______________________________________________ Trom mailing list Trom@lists.newciv.org http://lists.newciv.org/mailman/listinfo/trom
