************* The following message is relayed to you by [email protected] ************
Then what the $#@! is the definition of the word "importances" as is used by Dennis?
This is a good example of the insanity of Dennis and TROM. The steep gradient. The lack of accurate definition and examples. The assumptions that he makes that a student should know or be able to figure out or understand him. Maybe they are not even assumptions. I get the idea (from the hidden energetic postulates embedded in TROM) that it was Dennis' intention to give the student a mystery sandwich, a brain fuck. And the resulting misunderstoods and mysteries that are created, are overwhelms in themselves. And that you are perpetuating Paul, by telling me that affirmations are not really or may not be "importances", and not defining the word "importances" and giving practical examples. This drives a sane and intelligent person into madness and then apathy. I would like others who understand this issue to speak up on this subject too, and explain it. David On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 1:31 AM, Paul Tipon <[email protected]>wrote: > ************* > The following message is relayed to you by [email protected] > ************ > > To me, affirmations and importances are two different things. > Affirmations are statements. They may not necessarily be important and > are just a stand alone statement affirming something like a fact. From a > dictionary, something declared to be true; a positive statement or > judgment. This does not always by itself convey an importance. An > importance can be given in an affirmation but more to the jist of the > importance, the affirmation is a statement while an importance is ... quality > or condition of being important; a significance of higher or lesser value. > The affirmation is the statement that gives the importance but it is not > the importance itself. > > It's really a fine line between the two. They can be the same but it is > not a given that affirmations = importances at all times and instances. > They are two different things. > > Paul > > On Jan 26, 2014, at 11:39 AM, David Pelly wrote: > > ************* > The following message is relayed to you by [email protected] > ************ > Paul, > > Would you agree that the definition of the word "importances" as used in > TROM in > "Repair of Importances" is of comparable magnitude to "affirmations"? > > > As defined here: > > An affirmation is a statement that is carefully crafted to address an > unwanted pattern and transform it through the use of positive thought. > > An affirmation or affirming statement can be a phrase that is written > down or a statement that is repeated verbally. > > An affirmation may also be an audio recording that is listened to > repeatedly. > > Affirmations focus attention on the positive outcome of a situation, and > are structured to affirm that the positive outcome is already a reality. > > For instance, a person who has developed a pattern of unfulfilling > relationships <http://voices.yahoo.com/theme/1394/relationships.html> may > affirm, "I am full of love, and I experience meaningful personal > relationships now". > > The usefulness of affirmations is most succinctly summed up by the phrase, > "Thoughts are things". > > Experts on the effectiveness of affirmations explain that the subconscious > mind is always responding to our inner dialogue and self-talk. > > Further, our subconscious mind is using our beliefs and self-talk to > create our experiences and our lives. > > Our inner beliefs and self-talk may be rooted in limiting beliefs that > were formed early in life that do not assist us in achieving our goals and > dreams. > > For some, painful and dysfunctional life experiences have created a > self-defeating inner dialogue. T > > The use of affirmations has been compared to a positive form of > brainwashing. > > Through the use of affirmations individuals seek to reprogram the > thoughts, feelings, and self-talk that is influencing the subconscious > mind, thus changing their experience and their life. > > All of the above are affirmations and how affirmations may be used but one > will have to still say that the affirmation is of some importance or of no > importance. Give that importance or there is none, only the affirmation. > Importance is not automatically inferred just because an affirmation is > used to convey the idea. One could affirm that pennies are made of copper > and also state that whether or not they are made of copper is really of no > importance at all. So there is the affirmation and the statement that > there is no importance connected with the affirmation. > > Paul > > _______________________________________________ > Trom mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.newciv.org/mailman/listinfo/trom > >
_______________________________________________ Trom mailing list [email protected] http://lists.newciv.org/mailman/listinfo/trom
