************* The following message is relayed to you by [email protected] ************
But he cracked the code its in the games manual TROM .
Took , resolved and ran with what LRH got stuck in . GPMs Even to this day the COS has flawed tech. LRH got as far as GPMs. Dennis fixed it . LRH had the wrong opposers with GPMs GPM stands for goals, problems and mass.. He was close. LRH was, but he just used the wrong opposition. there's more than that too. the " tone scale " is all wrong. The 4 flows are a waste of time . Not saying they dont exist, but simply not needed and not beneficial . quote " *Questioning everything* This meant questioning Ron's analysis of the problem. He had concluded that a separate therapist was vital, and the evidence had seemed to say that he was right. I had to question this. When I got home, I went to my study, took out a sheet of paper and wrote down exactly what I thought was the function of an auditor in session. I wrote down on another sheet of paper exactly what the preclear (client) does and what is his function in the session. Then I said to myself: Well, if it is going to be a do-it-yourself therapy, the preclear is going to have to run both the auditor's role and the preclear's role simultaneously - but how can this be done when the person is dealing with his/her reactive bank, which is going to cut out the analytical mind? I put that to one side with a question mark, and asked: What is re-stimulation? It is an incident from the past moving into the present, affecting the analytical mind even to the point of cutting out that mind completely. Then I recalled what I regard as one of Ron's great discoveries: "if you can get the preclear to do consciously that which his mind does automatically, he will regain control of that function of his psyche." So maybe the problem would crack if the person, on a do-it-yourself basis, were to take things out of his past and bring them into the present and put them back out into the past again, and bring them into the present......to learn how to do consciously, what his reactive mind does automatically, to start to take over the automaticity. Then and there, I knew I'd cracked it. That had been the missing datum. The analytical part of the psyche can duplicate exactly what the reactive mind can do. The analytical faculty has at it's disposal the creative faculty of the whole spiritual being, and can simulate, create, bring about, mockup, and do exactly what the reactive part of the mind is doing. Evidently, the analytical part of the mind has decided not to do this, but it can learn (or relearn) how to do so. The next day, I got to work on the technique. It was not long before I spotted precisely what needed to be done, and this became the first step of the do-it-yourself procedure that is now called TROM, The Resolution of the Mind. I started to apply this to myself, tested it, and found that it did not need any modification. It was right. And it did the trick! *Stability* In TROM, Level One finds out if the person is sufficiently mentally stable to run do-it-yourself. How stable does a person have to be? It is not very high. Remember the old CCH levels? (i.e. a series of processes in full called Communication, Control, Havingness). If a person needs the old CCHs to be run, then those should be run on him by an auditor before he solos on Level Two. >From my experience as an auditor, from that of other auditors and by what Ron said on the subject, only a very tiny proportion (about 5%) of humanity need running on the CCHs before doing subjective processes. That doesn't say that the 95% are easy cases, and the world is full of tough cases that do not need the CCHs. Interestingly, once such a CCH case has completed the CCHs, then does Level One of TROM, he will find that he is above that level, will of course pass the Test, and can now go on to Level Two and say good-bye to the separate therapist. So 95% of the human race can quickly start straight in at Level Two, after testing and passing on Level One. Well, I soon found myself sitting at the top of Level Three, wondering where to go, and the only subject that was interesting me was that of purposes, goals, --- raw postulates. In the early 1960s I had done the Saint Hill Briefing Course. I reviewed everything I had learnt on that, but none of it helped. Back on my own again, I learned how to handle postulates in conflict --- and found out that Ron had never learnt how to do it. There was a certain fundamental truth in that area that he had not spotted. My own techniques for resolving postulates in conflict ---- handle correct goals packages. I found what the true goals packages look like and how to take them apart. You will find this, and it is in Levels Four and Five of TROM. The research on goals and so forth took me about a year to iron out and turned out to be a lot more complex than I had thought it would be, especially Level Five. I understood why Ron had failed in 1960. His efforts were valiant. He was almost doomed to fail. The actual legs, the actual postulates of the true GPMs aren't in the reactive bank. They're in the analytical mind. If you search in the bank, you will do it all wrong. It is an analytical construct, so they're in the analytical mind. All that is in the bank is a mish-mash of wrong opposers. The lies. The truth is in the analytical mind. So the mistake Ron made on the subject of goals was to look into a mass of lies, in the bank, for the truth. That is why the search went on forever, and why he nearly killed himself in the 1960s. end DHS quote SLIM -- Have a nice day *: ) *
_______________________________________________ Trom mailing list [email protected] http://lists.newciv.org/mailman/listinfo/trom
