************* The following message is relayed to you by [email protected] ************ Hi all
Light is the visible range of the electromagnetic spectrum. By postulate we can make it two things. Light and Dark. Now with more postulates we load it up with somatics, sensations, emotions and considerations. Light is easier to see while in, Safe, the path of the righteous, less likely to bump into the furniture when on etc. Dark is painful cause you stumble over the furniture when it's dark, scary cause bad guys and monsters hide there etc. With auditing out the postulates connected with Light and Dark the two begin to have less separation until when the last somatic, emotion and postulate goes the dichotomy merges back to where it started. Light is the visible range of the electromagnetic spectrum. Life is full of dichotomies. Keep on TROMing Pete Sent from my iPad > On Feb 9, 2014, at 5:12 AM, Svoboda Vladimir <[email protected]> wrote: > > ************* > The following message is relayed to you by [email protected] > ************ > May i add, Paul? > IMHO, > White and black is not polarity, these are "two > ends of one stick". > I have life goal and it is clear as a > daylight. My mind is light.If I carry out this > purpose I meet an opposition. I accumulate the scenes of the oppositions. My > mind darkens. If I > group those scenes to condense bad experiense then will watch > through these scenes and it seem as a darkness. > The life purpose is ionized by the white. It's the white flow. The Inversion > of the life purpose ( to kill, to destroy) is ionized by the > black. It's the black. > The Evil are black condensed pictures and heavy feelings. > There is energetic trick for change of trouble area. It's a process "Black > and White". > When I see a black field on my mental screen i know there are a lie and > illusion of a conflict. The abstract description isn't a real thing and I > try not to mix them in my practice. > The concepts of "black and white" are very abstract but we can see concrete > things empirically. > P.S.: > Who or what oppouse me? ...and I seem as a black demon with dark face. I am > joking)) Nobody. I create and have other who creates too. It is the true as > is. But the illusion is very very solid. > Ah, and my opinion about high TA: > I noticed that sometimes I used RI and timebreaking as a > way to run away from a PT problem but didn't pay attention on the problem > directly. > RI is best, but it is very long if I don't know where is my attention. If I > know or focus my attention directly on the problem then i am able to take it > in RI consciously. In this case, RI and TB are best troubleshooting. > Sometimes timebreaking is applied to "dead horse": dub-ins and sensations > from those. > In a case when I have a high TA with a stuck needle, it mean a lot of mental > mass and the postulates in opposition: "I want to know a cause of the > trouble, to focus on the mental stuff - It must not to be known ( > not-isness)". It is a silly game with own mind. It isn't the absolute right > rule but is an example easy. > Now, i understand a role of the postulates in the creation of any stuff but > someone goes in the dark fog. > F. Gordon is again: http://worldtrans.org/fgordon/terra1.html > > _______________________________________________ > Trom mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.newciv.org/mailman/listinfo/trom _______________________________________________ Trom mailing list [email protected] http://lists.newciv.org/mailman/listinfo/trom
