*************
The following message is relayed to you by [email protected]
************
Enjoying reading last few posts.
SLIM "If the past-of the universe is knowable+, that means, by the law
of duality, and polarity , then..... the future+ must be, not knowable-"
SEAN Considering the idea caused this thought: the past of universe you
call knowable+ is to me the not-knowing contents of universe which masks
(but can also be structured to be conducive to) pure knowing itself
which always is just knowing, in other words knowing is never things or
about things, quite simple but I think we often ignore it, well of
course we do : )
I also notice this subtle dynamic is the root of most
arguments/conflicts I get into with, well, people who's knowing is
mostly about things, there is such a knowledge, a LEDGE of knowing,
which is the domain and about the domain of things, and I love that, its
great and useful and all, and I'm not pushing against it, but when I say
knowing I usually mean no-thing knowing itself as no-thing, rather than
a particular thing or state or perspective as being 'it', obvious really
but amazing how many conflicts are based on this level of differing
approach.
SLIM "The importance is 'Freedom from Importances', the ultimate viewpoint"
SEAN This made me realise: one is already the most important factor
throughout all reality, without doing anything, so does not have to
manifest a perspective in oneself to prove it, in fact cannot prove it
that way ultimately, but can play games that way, none of which are
important or ever will be more important than the original situation of
being and the power to play in itself.
Great, this is fun, these are useful insights to be having, but not
important of course : )
Bye for now
Sean
_______________________________________________
Trom mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.newciv.org/mailman/listinfo/trom
