************* The following message is relayed to you by [email protected] ************
Good stuff!
Thanks for posting that Colleen. I saved it. David Dennis was asked to evaluate "The Unstacking Procedure" and he started talking about the danger of asking the mind for opposers. He suggested this process instead. "You could erase the dog from his mind by asking him, “What is the purpose,” or function if you like, usually if it’s a life… living creature you say purpose, if it’s an inanimate object you’ll say function. You say, “What is the purpose of a dog? and the preclear tells you, and you take up…you can put him on the meter... and you take up each one of the purposes of the dog. Preclear says, “Oh dogs bark.” And you say “Well how do you feel about that?” “Oh,” he says, “I have this terrible thing, we used to live next door to a dog that barked all the time. It drove me mad.” You know, and you take this up and you run this material you see and so he was all right about that purpose. And you say, “Is there any other purpose that a dog has?” and he says, “Well it’s a… they bite people.” “Oh, well how do you feel…” He says, “Oh, I got bitten by a dog once. He says. And so you run that material there. You see? See what you’re doing here, you are discharging the dog's purposes. His opposition to… but you’re not mentioning the word oppose, you see. He’s really smart. You’re not mentioning the word oppose. You’re saying, “ what’s the dog’s purposes?” This was written in the context of "never ask the PC for what opposes a goal" because the PC will only give wrong answers from his engram bank. Eventually you go through all these purposes and get them all squared around and he feels alright about a dogs purposes. He feels better about those purposes. Then you say to him, “What purposes have you had or got towards A dog?” and then you take up his side… this side of the coin. “Oh, well I’ve always had this urge to kick a dog, you know.” “Oh well, how do you feel about that?” you find some incidents where he kicked dogs, and he secretly kicked dogs and done all this, that and the other thing, see, and you go along with this till you got all his purposes out regarding the dog. And you go back to the dog, “Well are any umm… What are the purposes of a dog?” and see if any more material showed up and you keep going backwards and forwards on these purposes towards the dog and the dogs purposes towards him. Low and behold, magic, the dog would vanish out of his mind, cause you… you’ve erased all the purposes, you see? He’s now got all the purposes there and he’s got them sort of squared around and you haven’t mentioned the dog’s package, but you… you… you… the technique is powerful enough to erase the dog out of his mind. Just there… and it proves that… that uhh… that uhh… that all that is present there is the purposes. You could do it with a house brick, you know. You could… you could erase a house brick." Dennis was asked to evaluate "The Unstacking Procedure" and he started talking about the danger of asking the mind for opposers. He suggested this process instead. "You could erase the dog from his mind by asking him, “What is the purpose,” or function if you like, usually if it’s a life… living creature you say purpose, if it’s an inanimate object you’ll say function. You say, “What is the purpose of a dog? and the preclear tells you, and you take up…you can put him on the meter... and you take up each one of the purposes of the dog. Preclear says, “Oh dogs bark.” And you say “Well how do you feel about that?” “Oh,” he says, “I have this terrible thing, we used to live next door to a dog that barked all the time. It drove me mad.” You know, and you take this up and you run this material you see and so he was all right about that purpose. And you say, “Is there any other purpose that a dog has?” and he says, “Well it’s a… they bite people.” “Oh, well how do you feel…” He says, “Oh, I got bitten by a dog once. He says. And so you run that material there. You see? See what you’re doing here, you are discharging the dog's purposes. His opposition to… but you’re not mentioning the word oppose, you see. He’s really smart. You’re not mentioning the word oppose. You’re saying, “ what’s the dog’s purposes?” This was written in the context of "never ask the PC for what opposes a goal" because the PC will only give wrong answers from his engram bank. Eventually you go through all these purposes and get them all squared around and he feels alright about a dogs purposes. He feels better about those purposes. Then you say to him, “What purposes have you had or got towards A dog?” and then you take up his side… this side of the coin. “Oh, well I’ve always had this urge to kick a dog, you know.” “Oh well, how do you feel about that?” you find some incidents where he kicked dogs, and he secretly kicked dogs and done all this, that and the other thing, see, and you go along with this till you got all his purposes out regarding the dog. And you go back to the dog, “Well are any umm… What are the purposes of a dog?” and see if any more material showed up and you keep going backwards and forwards on these purposes towards the dog and the dogs purposes towards him. Low and behold, magic, the dog would vanish out of his mind, cause you… you’ve erased all the purposes, you see? He’s now got all the purposes there and he’s got them sort of squared around and you haven’t mentioned the dog’s package, but you… you… you… the technique is powerful enough to erase the dog out of his mind. Just there… and it proves that… that uhh… that uhh… that all that is present there is the purposes. You could do it with a house brick, you know. You could… you could erase a house brick." _______________________________________________ Trom mailing list [email protected] http://lists.newciv.org/mailman/listinfo/trom
_______________________________________________ Trom mailing list [email protected] http://lists.newciv.org/mailman/listinfo/trom
