************* The following message is relayed to you by [email protected] ************
Hi Nic It was my error. Dennis doesn't mention the tone scale.
Sincerely Pete Sent from my iPad > On Sep 7, 2014, at 1:54 AM, "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > wrote: > > ************* > The following message is relayed to you by [email protected] > ************ > [Dennis says that emotion is more related to separation in space with pain > > occurring in too close contact followed by sexual sensation at close > > distance > > followed by apathy, grief, fear, anger, antagonism, boredom, enthusiasm as > > distance increases. And moving on to esthetics or beauty. Pete] > > Hi Pete and Ant. I know very well > Trom in that you do not use a meter, and > tone scale. From this paragraph seems > mentioned by Dennis. I just wanted to > know, if the tone of Conservatism, is > been omitted from Dennis. Or is it a > oversight, or an error of Pete. where > Dennis talks about it? Curiosity. > Thank you, Nic. > ----Messaggio originale---- > Da: [email protected] > Data: 6-set-2014 23.46 > A: "TROM"<[email protected]> > Ogg: [TROM1] CDEI scale > > Here are a couple of interesting articles from the Ghost Danse website. > http://www.censorthis.com/ouran/ghosthome.html > The author might as well be describing TROM. > > Keep on TROMing > Pete > > GOALS AND THE CDEI SCALE > > > Case consists of charged polarities. ANY charged polarity. It can be > love/hate, can/can't, have/not-have, know/not-know, male/female, anything > which has been divided that gets charged up. > A polarity becomes charged when one end of it is pursued as a goal. > > The action of pursuing one end of a polarity involves denying the other end > as undesired, unknowable, resisted, unbeable, etc. > > [Note the dichotomy is not a game. It just splits an effect into two pieces > and the being decides one is preferred over the other-pete] > > At a very high level, a person is creating BOTH ends of any polarity. By > pursuing only one end, the person is denying their own creation. This act of > putting something there and then trying to make it not exist is the real > cause of the charge. It is charged because the person is "NOT-WHOLE" on that > subject. > > Any polarity of which a person is pursuing one end as a goal operates on the > scale of goal pursuit, which is the basic CDEI scale (this is a shortened > version of the scale): > CURIOUS > DESIRE > ENFORCE > INHIBIT > NO > REJECTED > This is the decay scale of any goal. Let me repeat that, because I do not > recall it ever been said by LRH: THE CDEI SCALE IS THE DECAY SCALE FOR GOALS. > Curiosity and desire bind the person to the goal, which Buddha warned > against, and which leads to what Edmund Meadows calls "white mass". The > remainder of the CDEI scale creates "black mass" in the mind. The difference > between white and black is simply whether it is being obliterated from sight > or not. If it is resisted, it goes black in the mind (then invisible). > > Ouran > > [white and black mass which Dennis says indicates life goals and non life > goals- Pete ] > NEW CDEI SCALE BUTTON FOR GOALS PROCESSING > > > A few weeks ago I had the opportunity to watch a friend do a demonstration > session using Zivorad Slavinski's Aspectika process. There was quite a > difference between reading the process on paper and watching it being run on > a processee. For one thing I could SEE what was happening in front of me. > Aspectika is goals processing. It runs goals in chains by locating the higher > goal which is behind the one being examined, then taking up that higher one, > then looking for the one higher than it. This is quite a departure from the > Scn line plot. A line plot is horizontal in level, and locating goals in > prior times never breaks out of the circle. Aspectika on the other hand looks > for higher goals, working upward into absolutes and finally into static > itself. > > One of my personal discoveries is that the CDEI scale is simply the decay > scale of a goal, any goal. I do not recall seeing that fact written anywhere, > but if it is, fine. Anyone who might have spotted that first, > congratulations! :) > > The CDEI scale phenomena is most likely what Buddha was talking about when he > spoke of "thirst" and "desire" being a major element of case. Goals decay > down this scale until the goal failure is intolerable, at which point the > person takes a new goal. This taking on a new goal can be done both > horizontally as seen in a line plot, and/or it can be done vertically as > witnessed in Aspectika processing. > > To refresh any memories, and for reference, here is the expanded CDEI scale > as given by Geoffrey Filbert: > > not know > know > unknown > wonder > curious > desired > enforced > inhibited > no > refused > false > denied > absurd > rationalized > abusive > horrible > compressed > conjured > recriminatory > > Watching the Aspectika session it became very obvious to me that a new, final > button would have to be added to the CDEI scale. That final button might not > always come after "recriminatory", it might appear higher up. For example, > "conjured" could well be the last hallucinatory creation in the very act of > beginning a new cycle. The final button appears on the scale at the point > where the goal failure is intolerable to the person. The final button of the > CDEI scale is: > > SUBSTITUTE > > Substitute ends the current goal by replacing it with a new goal. This button > is not only at the bottom of the CDEI scale, it is also at the top above "not > know" when working backwards along a chain of goals, or along a single goal > working back in time. When a new goal is substituted for the failed old one, > the new goal then decays normally from the top at "not know" through "know", > "unknown", "curious", etc. > > [with substitute added the CDEI scale is directly applicable to TROM and > Ouran is correct that it is a scale of the failure of a postulate -Pete] > > When using this new button in Scn style auditing be wary of simply working it > in an attempt to get charge off it. It is more than a charged button; it is > the link to a higher or previous goal. So be prepared to go earlier and/or > higher when you use it. > > A last caution about processing goals: the Scn habit of running goals with > terminals, and other physical universe existences described by nouns, is a > mistake. Doing so grounds the charge of the associated GPM(s) directly into > the thetan, and through the thetan into the body. Goals do not need to be run > in this dangerous manner any longer. I won't list the names of casualties > here. > > [definately TROM level 5. Put up postulate versus postulate and timebreaking > the effects that turn up in response. -Pete] > > Ouran > > back to index > Sent from my iPad > > > _______________________________________________ > Trom mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.newciv.org/mailman/listinfo/trom
_______________________________________________ Trom mailing list [email protected] http://lists.newciv.org/mailman/listinfo/trom
