************* The following message is relayed to you by [email protected] ************ Hey Pete I think if you want to write a second edition that's cool as long as it's clear it's your version. Also I think it doesn't matter what you use for a postulate provided you give a definition for it. For example we all grew up knowing red is red. But if red was blue we'd call red blue anyways. These are new to all.
Sent from my iPhone > On Aug 17, 2014, at 9:00 PM, Pete Mclaughlin > <[email protected]> wrote: > > ************* > The following message is relayed to you by [email protected] > ************ > Another thought on this conversation. > > If I go through life wanting to know then it is not apparent that the junior > goals packages are derived from the basic package. > > But if my primary postulate is "to be known" by others then it is obvious > that creating things others can see or controlling others or admiring others > could all be efforts to be known by others. > > I think this proves that the basic goals package is "to be known" and "to > know" only happens when I have failed at "being known" > > > By the way a vote on the "to be known" / "to know" issues is not a commitment > to buy anything. I just need to know the majority opinion. > > > Thanks > Pete > > Sent from my iPad > _______________________________________________ > Trom mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.newciv.org/mailman/listinfo/trom _______________________________________________ Trom mailing list [email protected] http://lists.newciv.org/mailman/listinfo/trom
