*************
The following message is relayed to you by [email protected]
************
Hi,
you remember, recently we had this subject of (c)-rights here
and for some it might not have been TROM-related at all.
Well, that's right of course - at shallow inspection at least.
Never the less the whole thing was/is of great value. And I'm
going to tell you why immediately.
Because on closer inspection of the question:
"Is The Subject Of (C) Related To the Subject Of TROM, Or Not?"
we can find out - and more or less can have a consensus on - the
following:
- The technology of TROM is heavily based on games and the theories
thereof.
- Rules are a inherent part of games.
- The societal pendants to rules in a civilization are the laws.
- (c)-legislation is a subclass of the class of all legislation
or law present in a society.
One could further say (I guess Dennis would have put it that way):
- IF game THEN rules/regulations
- IF rules THEN game (<- I'm not sure about that one)
- The rules of a game can be part of the game or at least a "higher"
game.
- The rules are controlled by the maker of the game.
- Rules can change while the game is still in progress (often classified
as "unfair play").
- Games can be interlocking or nested within each other.
Thus we have it, that nested games are junior to games of higher level.
This establishes a hierarchic order of games.
- There is a hierarchy as well to the game's participants:
..., broken pieces, pieces, players, master players, game makers, ...
I find it quite interesting, that a being can easily wear any of the above
"hats" simultaneously. It is only a matter of perspective one choses to
take in regard of the game(s) scenario.
E.g. A person can be a master player on his First Dynamic, but still be
just a piece in the game seen from a Fourth Dynamic viewpoint.
A made up example in regard of the rules/laws applied in games on earth -
and
their relativity in regard of application - gives us some very interesting
insights into: how rules can be "bent" or in other words: the relativity of
rule's meaning in relation to to whom they are applied and who applies
them.
(The interpretation of rules/laws is an additional subject here.)
Imagine you park your car on a forbidden area. You could expect to get a
ticket for doing so and have to pay a certain fee according to the local
regulations.
Now please stretch your fantasy and imagine Mr. President Obama letting
his limousine park right in front your garage door on "your property" ;-).
Well, do not expect that the law protects you in _that_ case. You may
consider
it a good idea to protect your "rights" yourself. Okay, walk out
with your gun in hand and ... oooh, next thing you realize is, that you
find
yourself exterior to what - just a second ago - had been your beloved body.
That piece of - now dead - meat, full of holes, laying stretched out on
what
was once your garden lawn, now soaked with blood.
By the way, did you ever wonder why the whole subject of law is made
so complicated that there is probably no one single human being capable of
comprehending it all. The books written about laws, lawmaking and the
statute
books itself are so voluminous that it requires numerous "experts" and
"specialists" to come to conclusions. Suspiciously enough, for this
wanna-be
"science of laws" even a special nomenclature had to be invented -
incomprehensible for the layman. Obviously those works had not been
created for people, but rather for the purposes of suppression and a great
opportunity to make a buck for those involved in the business of
legislation.
I hope that gives anyone an idea why TROM, laws in general and (c)-laws
in particular have indeed some relationship with each other and discussing
them here was hopefully not too far fetched. (At least most of the
regulations/
laws IMHO are only the monstrous product of insanity. And TROM is meant to
be
one possible remedy for that kind of aberration, right?)
How important or how necessary those relationships are, is of course still
open to discussion and to a certain degree a matter of opinion.
However that may be, I adhere to this: "Anything is better than Nothing."
:-)
ARC
Robin
P.S.:
In the course of time breaking it is almost impossible to not realize
that everything is somehow related and connected to everything else.
That is because all and anything is in some way or other similar and at the
same time different to everything else. An easy way to get down comm.-lag
on questions a) b) of TROM's L2 is of course to "zoom in" on a sub-atomic
or sub-quantum level on any object and you can immediately see the common
denominators or similarity for all objects. For the differences just look
at the properties x-y-z-t (= the coordinates of the objects in space-time).
They must be different. Otherwise the objects would be identical and thus
have been disappeared.
P.P.S.:
O-tone LRH on complexities:
(excerpt form 5911C07 1MACC 02 RECENT DEVELOPMENTS ON OT)
[Melbourne Advanced Clinical Course 2nd Lecture on 7.11.1959]
[.... It's like that in any field of human endeavor. And when something is
so complicated
that you can't understand it, then don't you be criticizing you as not
being able to understand
it! Because you've been taught that when you see something difficult or
incomprehensible
that you can't comprehend, that therefore, you, not understanding it, you
must be stupid! And
you've been taught to criticize yourself as the first reaction to a
complexity! Isn't that right?
Audience: Yes.
Well, we've got a new look at this. We find out this is just an operation.
This is just a
way to control people. Let's erect something here that has glittering
metal bars and balls and
transformers and dials and all sorts of things and then write a textbook
that has to do with the
quanta of the inverse electrode. Get the thing all computed out in
compound calculus with
analytical figments, get it put into the local university as a necessary
subject if you're going to
understand engineering, prove it all conclusively. Nobody understands it –
"You're flunked!
You're stupid! We of the great priesthood understand it. But you, you
louse... Therefore, we
are very great people. You owe us a debt. Look at all the work we go to
understanding this
thing." .....]
[.... True enough, if there's going to be anything to a big machine or
structure or
something, there will be some sort of a simplicity on which it's based.
And even though the
thing does look imposing at first glance, if it contains truth and
workability and has value,
then somewhere in it there is a simplicity that you can understand, and on
that simplicity you
can simply build the rest of the mechanism and understand the whole thing.
It might be that you didn't do it in a second, but if it took you two or
three days, begin
to suspect that there's something phony about it. You see that? ...]
(c) LRH ;-)
_______________________________________________
TROM mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.newciv.org/mailman/listinfo/trom
