*************
The following message is relayed to you by  [email protected]
************
Robin

You said:
"However, the necessity of an "anchor in present time" can be questioned.
(The idea that an anchor in PT is a necessity is eventually solely based
on the postulate thereof. If enough people agree with it, it finally will
become reality.)"

When the student of the mind starts taking his mind apart he needs to work from 
a firm foundation.

Hubbard noted this in some of his writings where any confusion can be resolved 
if you take one point in it and fix it as the anchor point and note the 
movement of all other items in the confusion as moving relative to this fixed 
point.

So if the student is going to take apart the confusing mess that is the mind he 
has to have a fixed point to work from.  The agreed upon reality which is 
present time is this fixed point, this foundation.  Once the student has done 
enough book and bottle or touching walls to get a firm grip on the agreed upon 
reality of present time then he can take apart his mind with the assurance that 
if things get chaotic he can grab ahold of PT reality and wait till things calm 
down again before proceeding.

For the spiritual being time does not exist. He simply is.  For the physical 
universe time is a necessary component as matter and energy must continually 
change in order to exist. If they stop changing they cease to exist.

Time breaking is just the student realizing that he is only affected by the 
content of his mind in present time.  It is an illusion that the stuff that 
happened in the past is effecting him now. So the student is just changing his 
viewpoint on when the content of the mind is. It is now, in present time and 
can be changed by the student deciding that the mind is no longer going to 
bother him in present time. 

Keep on TROMing
Pete McLaughlin

Sent from my iPad

> On Apr 8, 2016, at 1:36 AM, The Resolution of Mind list 
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> However, the necessity of an "anchor in present time" can be questioned.
> (The idea that an anchor in PT is a necessity is eventually solely based
> on the postulate thereof. If enough people agree with it, it finally will
> become reality.)

_______________________________________________
TROM mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.newciv.org/mailman/listinfo/trom

Reply via email to