************* The following message is relayed to you by [email protected] ************
Hi Karalee Very nice report. I am glad to see you are putting in the correct opposing postulates.
Keep on TROMing Pete Sent from my iPad > On Jun 11, 2017, at 5:32 PM, The Resolution of Mind list > <[email protected]> wrote: > > ************* > The following message is relayed to you by [email protected] > ************ > Hello, Trommers - karalee here, and ... > > This data is all within the scope of Level Three timebreaking, using Level > Two when needed on sticking incidents, and it gives me a juicy bone to chew > on, so to speak, during Level 3 timebreaking. > > Dennis' "To Handle" process ran: > "How have you handled your _______?" (for example, "mother") > -paired with- > "How has your ________ handled you?" > > In my case, just as Dennis proposed, running this "to handle" process over a > year ago exposed and neutralized live covert game strategies picked up in > childhood, but at one point my egoic mind felt the loss severely and wanted > to murder someone, so i would say it is a tough process and one must really > want the end phenomenon to be able to stick it out, doing it Dennis' way. and > before embarking on Level Five. > > In our current, almost daily sessions - myself and a twin - we've been using > Repeater Tech to time breakup hot IP states, toggling between the postulate > and its negative, i.e., "I must go to China" vs "I must not go to China". We > do it until no more change. > > For true opposers it would run: > I must go to China" vs "China must not let me go to China", i.e., "must know" > with opposer "must not be known". I want to know China and China does not > wish to be known. I'm superficially proposing that, and I have not tested it > out because we are getting good timebreaking of hot IP states. and running > true opposers this way might be premature. Plus I would need to stick with > life-oriented goals. > > We are running out a hotly reading IP state re "the stupid people". While > honoring Dennis' "to handle" postulate process, we ran: > > "The stupid people must handle me" > -toggled back and forth with- > "The stupid people must not handle me" > > AND > > "I must handle the stupid people" vs > "I must not handle the stupid people" > > If one particular person we were dramatizing as a "stupid person" was a > present time problem, we would use their name, i.e., "... stupid (John Doe)". > > Yes, now that I think of it, we could have run Dennis' process verbatim, "How > have you handled stupid people?" and "How have stupid people handled you?". > Repeater Tech seems more "friendly", because I've had people close down on me > when using Dennis' wording, and they saw where that was going to take them > .... they just were not ready for that gradient of clearing, and I found that > my twin did not shy away from running "to handle" using the above repeating > postulates, and it was a familiar, workable tech we had been using already. > > Finding the right end word(s) might have something to do with it, because we > first started with a childhood incident the person I'm working with > discovered while asking some questions along the lines of his current > importances, and it contained mixed up and confusing implanted postulates re > "fixing the stupid people", and is a present day hot games condition item for > my twin. > > I discovered it was a reading item for me too, and had an incredulous laugh > at who all actually came up for timebreaking.... ridicule, shame, blame, > guilt as methods of handling getting timebroken on all sides. I'm not > finished running out "ridicule" and am super-sensitive about it in my daily > interactions... both on the overt side and the motivator side of it. > > In addition, whenever during sessions there was a cognition or a "blow-down", > or discharge, we would pause the exercise to give it a neutral > acknowledgement, for example, "I acknowledge that the only way out of this > game is to do Trom (or its ilk)".... Or the cognition along the way of, "I > acknowledge these are mental machinations designed to make the game persist > in time". [my twin's cogs] Practicing neutral ACKS are a conscious exercise > in equanimity. > > It was revealing to me as I timebreaked whatever came up; scenes of > shame/blame and guilt/ridicule got timebroken. Repetitively punching in these > postulates eventually took us up the goals scale, all the way to "To Know vs > to not know the stupid people", still discharging the IP states, for example, > "I must know China" vs "I must not know China". > > Every now and then there is a sticking or sticky incident and one can spend a > little more time timebreaking it if they wish, and then continue with > repeating to oneself each postulate until there is no more change. We find > ourselves coming more and more uptone as we trudge through these postulates. > Dennis uses the term, "punch it in", and that is in effect what Repeater Tech > helps the person do - punch in the postulate. > > It reminds me of the "Archie Bunker" show, where he enjoys calling his wife > Edith a "dingbat".. Of course we all know that the category of "stupid > people" works on all flows, and is a way to keep another game going - a > service effect and overt/motivator cycle construct. > > Nevertheless, we are inching (or centimeter'ing) towards Level 4, which is > quite amazing in my case, considering I started this journey pulling myself > up from "sub-human" mind range, into a relatively more human range, and now > making cleaner and cleaner postulates and reaches towards what Dennis calls > "beyond human" ... exterior viewpoints. > > Happy Trom'ing, and inner peace and equanimity for > all "lifers" and "non-lifers" alike. Walk in grace and mercy until no more > mind to burn off. > > > > > _______________________________________________ > TROM mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.newciv.org/mailman/listinfo/trom
_______________________________________________ TROM mailing list [email protected] http://lists.newciv.org/mailman/listinfo/trom
