Davide Vernizzi wrote:
Do you have any other process which bind at the 30003?As to be expected, I did have the jTSS service running. :-)After freeing the socket, trousers works fine. It would be a good thing to have the port number configurable, right?Yes, you are right (we are actually working on this right now)... but then also applications must change the port number accordingly (maybe by specifying a URI in the Tspi_Context_Connect).
I just did some testing and decided to change the jTSS default port to 30004. This should help avoid collisions. It will be included in the upcoming release of jTSS.BTW, under Windows (Vista & 7) TrouSerS is built to use the TBS, which "multiplexes" the TPM and allows for concurrent TSS. We successfully tested TrouSerS in parallel with IFX's stack, and it would be nice to test also with jTSS. Does jTSS have configurable port number? If yes, could you test if they can coexist?
With this change I can confirm that jTSS and Trousers coexist happily on a single TBS-multiplexed TPM.
Regards, Ronald -- Dipl.-Ing. Ronald Tögl phone +43 316/873-5502 Trusted Computing Labs fax +43 316/873-5520 IAIK [email protected] Graz University of Technology http://www.iaik.tugraz.at
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
_______________________________________________ TrouSerS-tech mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/trousers-tech
