>
> Of course it is a possibility. The New International Version has parts
> missing that the King James Version includes.
DAVEH: Oooops......be careful or you too will agitate Brother Glenn! <VBG>
Not missing at all, their in the footnotes.
- Re: [TruthTalk] Is the Bible Complete?--Part 1 GJTabor
- Re: [TruthTalk] Is the Bible Complete?--Part 1 GJTabor
- Re: [TruthTalk] Is the Bible Complete?--Part 1 GJTabor
- Re: [TruthTalk] Is the Bible Complete?--Part 1 GJTabor
- Re: [TruthTalk] Is the Bible Complete?--Part 1 GJTabor
- Re: [TruthTalk] Is the Bible Complete?--Part 1 GJTabor
- Re: [TruthTalk] Is the Bible Complete?--Part 1 GJTabor
- Re: [TruthTalk] Is the Bible Complete?--Part 1 GJTabor
- Re: [TruthTalk] Is the Bible Complete?--Part 1 GJTabor
- Re: [TruthTalk] Is the Bible Complete?--Part 1 GJTabor
- Re: [TruthTalk] Is the Bible Complete?--Part 1 GJTabor

