of course you won't hear this from Rush Limbaugh and _Focus on the Family_  <rof..>
 
but, to get an idea of your own --try the local library, e.g., Frederick Lundburg, _The Rich and the Super-Rich_ --early 60s, about 650 pages, a classic sociology/study on 'old' and 'new' money and the 'preordained' ('dream' defying) class structure imbedded in Am society, pre-Gates/MS, of course
 
...but it don't matter; the 'old money' (.5% Am 'super rich' at the top which don't change membership inc the Bush family and the Kennedy family) is vastly richer than any sum of 'new money' inc Bill Gates'..or any Iraqi..
 
also, Dr. Lundburg views their wealth in terms of power and control of society/ies, e.g. administrative control of both financial and legal policy frieghted to favor their class, the super rich..
 
GWB, like e.g JFK was, is (also, relative to Terry's comments on Masonic 'businessmen') their current emissary/servant
 
..IOW, W = 'water boy', Iz <rof>
 
..wheee, but he's a WB who can order Gen Franks to take a hike 
 
..around KBunk Port in his Daddy's Rolls Royce limo <rof>
 
..then down to the yacht club for lunch to discuss the battle of Baghdad with Barbara..
 
..whewy..ain't many of them kinda WBs, Iz..
 
Is that why you'd countenance this confusion about who you worship--you think JC ain't that rich??
 
..don't worry, i'm not sayin' HillaryC is rich--she'll be usin' her book revenues to pay her legal bills <rof..>
 
..maybe some heavenly havanas for her hubby?? <..x666!>
 
 but that's what she gets for messin' with religious tycoons..
 
On Tue, 10 Jun 2003 13:23:58 -0500 "ShieldsFamily" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

More slanderous unproved rumors..

 

On Sun, 8 Jun 2003 14:27:49 -0400 "David Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
<<Is it George Bush or Saddam Hussein who had an opulent

palace for each member of his family while his people wallowed

in poverty?>>

 

George Bush, Sr. is a proper comparison in this tightly knit 'algorhythmic'--but not very probing--question...actually, Augustus Bush, several generations back, is even more appropriate..since his heyday, the Bush family, like the Kennedys, has become 50 (500?) times wealthier than any Iraqi...also, it's a 'both/and', not 'either/or' situation--the NT does not exclude whomever (our/any) patriots wanna exempt from serving the Lord--we ALL 'gotta serve somebody':)

Reply via email to