Re: [TruthTalk] Christmas Trees

[ttxpress]

'baptized'?   On Thu, 11 Dec 2003 17:59:56 -0600 "ShieldsFamily" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: g, I am still waiting to hear—were you ever baptized? Izzy   -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2003 3:45 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Christmas Trees   Does anybody here (on TT) believe that the Trees lit by a Bush are 'pagan'?   If no/t, would you prefer to conclude that the Bush is 'pagan'? gary ottoson :: http://aa1ltd.blogspot.com  (<--fyi, new poetry posted:)   On Wed, 10 Dec 2003 16:08:22 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:   so,people aren't 'pagan' (or 'wrong'), it's the tree/s..no wonder some people'd rather climb a flag pole..would you consider the Trees 'pagan' that the Bushs lit?   On Wed, 10 Dec 2003 00:34:10 EST [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: In a message dated 12/9/2003 6:29:57 PM Central Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: 'pagan' = 'wrong'?   no   but if they think a tree is pagan and it bothers them then don't fool with it!  Laura       gary ottoson :: http://poet235.com   gary ottoson :: http://poet235.com