Re: **Possible_Spam** Re: [TruthTalk] TEST

[Dave]

DAVEH:  Note.....I did not write the below 2 sentences in red that end with "mormon??? Izzy".     Izzy, I'm not sure why you think I'm bordering on making "repeat blasphemous accusations against the Lord".  I merely mentioned something I heard on a TV program that I thought was interesting.  Do you think it would have been a problem (from a Protestant's perspective) if Jesus had been married? ShieldsFamily wrote: DAVEH: So now you are going to repeat blasphemous accusations against the Lord of Lords and King of Kings, to try to bring him down to the level of your �messiah� Joe Smith, the adulterer? Isn�t that a bit low, even for a mormon??? Izzy -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Dave Sent:Sunday, December 14, 20031:53 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: **Possible_Spam** Re: [TruthTalk] TEST DAVEH:  Is that doctrinally (that he had not married) accepted by Protestants, Izzy?  Awhile back I watched a show on one of the arts channels (A&E, I think) about Jesus.  They suggested there was reason to believe he may have been married.  ShieldsFamily wrote:  Blaine; I hear the JS was rich in wives. Unlike Messiah, who had none. Izzy -- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Dave Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.langlitz.com ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ If you wish to receive things I find interesting, I maintain Five email lists... JOKESTER, OPINIONS, LDS, STUFF and MOTORCYCLE.