Super duper! Bravo! Right on! Gold stars and smiley
faces for Dave and Lance }:>) yea (<:{
----- Original Message -----
From: "David Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2004 1:04 PM
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Re:Response to David's
Response on Systems
> > David, I believe you missread the central thrust of the
> > quotation. It has to do with human constructs. It has
> > to do with the distinction between relativity & relativism.
>
> Hmmm. Ok. I think I see better what you are getting at.
>
> Lance wrote:
> > One ought not to equate one's statement of the truth
> > with the TRUTH. One could only wish that all scripture
> > was self-interpreting. Were this the reality then,
> > these "posts" wouldn't be quite so diverse.
>
> Oh, ok, I hear you now loud and clear.
>
> Hey, tell me straight if you would. Do I muddy the waters sometimes by
> jumping in the way I do? Would it be better, in your opinion, for me to
> say less perhaps? Or does digging in on a question sometimes help? I
> must admit that sometimes I feel I have wasted my time when I see the
> kind of response my posts bring. :-)
>
> Lance wrote:
> > Short answer to your direct q. No, we can't.
> > We can KNOW the truth (Christ in you the hope
> > of glory) but all of our articulations of that
> > (experienced) truth are approximations.
> > Do you agree?
>
> Yes, I absolutely agree. Nevertheless, I do think there are differences
> of truth, and how truth might be articulated. Some matters are better
> articulated than others. Some matters, by their nature, can never be
> expressed with words, but only superficially talked about, moving around
> it, until the person through some kind of revelation or insight sees
> what it is that you are trying to point him toward. It is this
> difference between some truths that are more easily talked about and
> other truths that are less able to be talked about that sometimes
> creates the illusion that we can know and teach truth across the board.
>
>
> Thanks for helping me see the point better. I guess if we all
> recognized this principle, none of us would be so dogmatic and assertive
> in what we say in this forum. We would not be trying to grab the tail
> of the lizard, but be pointing to the lizard. We would try harder to
> hear one another and put less effort into trying to mold others into our
> own personal worldview. I'm going to chew on this for awhile. Thanks
> for sharing.
>
> Peace be with you.
> David Miller, Beverly Hills, Florida.
>
> ----------
> "Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you ought to answer every man." (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org
>
> If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.
>
