|
John, I would like to address the issue that
this brought up for me; namely that of Encouragers vs. Discouragers. I think
you are either one or the other. We all know (I hope) why it is good to be an
Encourager. (Although some do not seem to know how to go about it very well.) I
am certainly not perfected in this area, either, but seeing some of the
nastiness here on TT makes me very aware of why I don’t want to be a
Discourager any more. The main problem for me with Discouragers
is that they cause walls of division between people, whether Christian or not. There
is no chance for relationship in an adversarial discussion. In my mind, when I
read posts from negative, shouting, accusing, condemning, my-opinion-is-vastly-
superior-to-your-opinion Discouragers I see walls going up to form little castles
with high towers of defenses from people of other persuasions. Instead of
seeing guns or cannons sticking out from the walls, I see fingers pointing out
in defiant accusation. It’s as if the Discouragers are saying, “You
may not enter here into my Domain of Absolute Correctness, and you certainly
cannot be a Christian unless I decide you qualify. What are your qualifications,
before I allow you to enter?!!!!” These walls discourage anyone from wanting
to befriend the Discourager, or worse yet, to know the Jesus that the
Discourager claims to represent. If they are ineffective in their
discouragement, they are just rebuffed. But if they are effective, that is much worse, because
they do such damage to tender hearts and souls; a terrible, sometimes permanent
damage to Believers and unbelievers, alike. He drew a circle that shut me out, How do we love the Discouragers without
pretending that it is acceptable for them to treat us with absolute disrespect?
I, for one, cannot carry on a conversation with the Body while someone is
standing, shouting, in my face. And I don’t think Jesus would put up with
it either. My only answer is to treat a Discourager like a little child, who
must go and sit in the corner until they decide to behave with civility. That’s
where I am. Any other suggestions, Encouragers? Is there any point in
trying to reason with the unreasonable? Or would TT be no fun anymore without
all this conflict??? Izzy From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] In a message dated 3/31/2004 7:38:32 AM Pacific Standard
Time, John, Well, there went
another possible opening for condemning
|
- Re: [TruthTalk] knowing Truth Kevin Deegan
- [TruthTalk] Re:Kevein: Who wouda' Guessed Lance Muir
- RE: [TruthTalk] knowing Truth David Miller
- RE: [TruthTalk] knowing Truth Kevin Deegan
- RE: [TruthTalk] knowing Truth David Miller
- RE: [TruthTalk] knowing Truth Kevin Deegan
- Re: [TruthTalk] knowing Truth Knpraise
- Re: [TruthTalk] knowing Truth ttxpress
- RE: [TruthTalk] knowing Truth ShieldsFamily
- Re: [TruthTalk] knowing Truth Knpraise
- [TruthTalk] knowing Truth ShieldsFamily
- [TruthTalk] knowing Truth Judy Taylor
- Re: [TruthTalk] knowing Truth Knpraise
- Re: [TruthTalk] knowing Truth Knpraise
- RE: [TruthTalk] knowing Truth ShieldsFamily
- Re: [TruthTalk] knowing Truth Terry Clifton
- Re: [TruthTalk] knowing Truth Knpraise
- Re: [TruthTalk] knowing Truth Knpraise
- Re: [TruthTalk] knowing Truth Kevin Deegan
- Re: [TruthTalk] knowing Truth Knpraise
- Re: [TruthTalk] knowing Truth Kevin Deegan

