|
Aren’t you always? Iz From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] in that rather large-print response of
John's, below, I noticed an omission--of "not"--thought but not typed, so perhaps one could term this mistake a (corrected)
typo now, rather than faux pax <--how's my French, Iz? We seem to be
communicating well? Am I dreaming? L, G On Thu, 1 Apr 2004 18:14:25 EST [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
|
- Re: Fw: Re: [TruthTalk] knowing Truth Knpraise
- Re: [TruthTalk] knowing Truth Knpraise
- Re: [TruthTalk] knowing Truth Knpraise
- [TruthTalk] knowing Truth Judy Taylor
- Re: [TruthTalk] knowing Truth Knpraise
- Re: [TruthTalk] knowing Truth Knpraise
- Re: [TruthTalk] knowing Truth ttxpress
- RE: [TruthTalk] knowing Truth ShieldsFamily
- Re: [TruthTalk] knowing Truth Knpraise
- Re: [TruthTalk] knowing Truth ttxpress
- Re: [TruthTalk] knowing Truth ShieldsFamily
- Re: [TruthTalk] knowing Truth ttxpress
- RE: [TruthTalk] knowing Truth ShieldsFamily

