In a message dated 4/7/2004 9:28:29 AM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:


John's apologetic for Jonathon looks to have an autobiographical bent as he continues with his father's M.O. with more distractions and diversions rather than addressing the falsity of Jonathon's statements or the truth of mine.


Actually, I thought that I had dealt with it quite handily.  I seldom read beyond the opening statement if that statement is spurious from the beginning.  Yours was and I didn't.  

John

Reply via email to