----- Original Message -----
Sent: June 03, 2004 09:59
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] (no
subject)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 6/2/2004 11:34:28 PM Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
DAVEH:
Ignore for a moment your concern for a second chance after
death. (That is a different discussion, Laura.) Do you believe
those who do not have the chance to accept Jesus while in mortality, will
have a chance to accept him after death? To me, the Bible suggests
that is the case. Not only did some early Christians baptize for the
dead (which implies they thought the previously dead folks would have a
chance to accept Jesus in the post mortal realm), but I've previously
mentioned 1Pet 3:18-19 and 1Pet 4:6 as evidence that Jesus preached the
gospel to dead folks so that they could be judged as though in the flesh,
in order that they can live according to God. What passages do you
feel suggest that those who did not have the opportunity to accept Jesus
in mortality, would not have the chance after death?
--
i have to agree with Judy's post and Ro 1:17 that Perry posted.
DAVEH: You may agree with vs 17, but I don't
quite see why you would think it applies to this thread.
I don't think those who have not heard the gospel will have a second
chance.
DAVEH: ??? How can you perceive it
as a second chance IF they never had a first chance prior??? Let
me ask it this way, Laura......do you think God gives everybody a FIRST chance
to hear the gospel and accept Jesus? IOW......do you think there are any
mortals who never had the chance to hear the gospel and accept Jesus?
What would be the point in spending billions of dollars and
sending people all over the world to tell others about Christ? Why
would Jesus have commanded us to "go into all the
world..."
DAVEH: Actually, he commanded his apostles
to do such. Christians commonly assume that applies to them as well.
We could just sit back and enjoy our stained glass ornate
buildings and spend our time anyway we want to. Then when someone dies
we could just go get baptized for them. (I'm not suggesting that this
is what LDS do) I am just saying that we would be wasting our time
making the effort to evangelize the world.
DAVEH:
You are making assumptions that are incorrect and illogical. Doing the
Lord's work is not a waste of time, regardless if he has somebody else to do
it should we fail to do so.
Why do Mormon's send out missionaries? Is it not to spread their
version of the gospel? Again, this is not a put
down. It just doesn't make any sense to me.
DAVEH: That you do not understand it, does not
make it meaningless or impertinent. The Lord's work needs
servants. If the gospel were not propagated by his servants, his work
would not come to fruition nearly as quickly.
Laura
--
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Dave Hansen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.langlitz.com
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
If you wish to receive
things I find interesting,
I maintain Five email lists...
JOKESTER, OPINIONS, LDS,
STUFF and MOTORCYCLE.