Re: [TruthTalk] Re: Fundamentalist

[Lance Muir]

Judyt:You know not whereof you speak. All raised in Christ does NOT=once saved always saved. All of us find it easier to substitute a charicature for critical thinking.   As to whether you're a 'fundie' or not?? If I (but that's just me) were a 'fundie profiler' I'd say yes. ----- Original Message ----- From: Judy Taylor To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: June 19, 2004 12:05 Subject: [TruthTalk] Re: Fundamentalist Lance, You will need to send us a "Topical Index" of your (and Jonathan's) definitions.  I would not call anyone on Jonathan's list a Fundamentalist (as I understand it); there are people in this country who pride themselves on being "fighting fundies" They are usually Bob Jones University graduates or people from legalistic type sects, (some Southern Baptist though not all). I wouldn't put Izzy, Terry, DavidM, or myself in that category.  We don't agree on every detail, fighting fundies would have to agree on doctrine and you are sounding closer to their doctrine that us with your all encompassing incarnation.  They teach a type of Calvinism "Once saved, always saved" that would go along with the TFT teaching that "all rose with/in Christ"     From: "Lance Muir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> G:I don't think that it is the Vatican that produces 'fundamentalists'. Every group whether religious, political or social has a 'fundamentalist' component/wing. In such there tends to be a disdain for anything 'gray'. Black and white are preferred.[EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: June 19, 2004 11:34 Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Re:Fundamentalist it's interesting that the activism of both Protestant and Catholic conservatives closely match on, e.g., abortion politics--jt and Izzy themselves are as anti-abortion as the Pope   apparently the Pope is a biblicist, too, and the match entails the conclusion that the Vatican produces 'fundamentalists'... G   On Fri, 18 Jun 2004 15:56:08 -0400 "Lance Muir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: ||   ..feel free to add to the list