Re: [TruthTalk] Oneness vs. Plurality -- Echad

[Lance Muir]

John:s'okay ya got my meanin'. Language is a blunt instrument, as has been said previously.Some, I'd suggest, more closely approximate this 'reality' in talk while others do in life. Both would be better...eh? ----- Original Message ----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: July 27, 2004 10:17 Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Oneness vs. Plurality -- Echad In a message dated 7/27/2004 6:54:44 AM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: When reality is conceptualized then, framed in human speach(sp?) you get, at best, an approximation. I think it extremely important to acknowledge (as you do in the above) that there is a reality  -- something written in stone  -- the "truth."  Ours is a "postualted truth" if you will.    We read the idea, seek revelation on the idea, expand upon the idea, and sometimes discover that it is wrong.   But until that happens, we consider it to be "the truth."  This is why God must be the savior and why Paul said "..  when we know  ..  we do not yet know as we should)  (I Co 8). I guess I could have simply said "amen" but I am in this preaching mode.   JD