OK Jonathan,
Thanks for sending these references.  I've checked them and have been aware of most of what they expose. Apparently Finis Dake was not a "perfect" man.  However, some of them are critiquing Dake from their own theological error which is as bad as his or worse.  I don't Amen the "Faith teachers" carte blanche - or Dakes beliefs concerning the trinity and some other things either.  But Finis Dake is not my source.  jt
 
From: "Jonathan Hughes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

http://www.apologeticsindex.org/d46.html

http://www.pfo.org/swaggart.htm

http://www.exorthodoxforchrist.com/finis_dake_2.htm

http://www.deceptioninthechurch.com/dangerous_dake_bible.htm

http://sites.onlinemac.com/trwmainst/dake.html

 

Jonathan


From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Judy Taylor
Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2004 8:11 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [TruthTalk] Why listen to voices from the past.

 

I realize and understand that he is now deceased and what I to the list below is his own story or testimony - This is the way it is presented.  He is not a doctor of the Church Nor is he some "famed" holy man or theologian who has been elevated to the status of Church Father.  To me there is a huge difference between his notes on scripture and the concept of Perichoresis from the 4th Century which has no basis in scripture.  I don't agree with Dake on every point but am not so conflicted that I need to throw out my Bible.  judyt

Reply via email to