Re: [TruthTalk] Bush's Brain

[ttxpress]

never mind--you don't even wanna read what'd be next..   i'm outa here, takin'  a break, goin' to Las Vegas, hittin' a home run, Lord willing:)     On Fri, 29 Oct 2004 17:26:21 -0400 Judy Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: How would her 'thought process' get on film in the first place - what Terry is addressing (I think) is the fact that most of what is put forth on film is pure fantasy from Disney on and 'so called' documentaries have their own spin.  The thinking that's important is that of the Lord.  [Judyt]       On Fri, 29 Oct 2004 14:54:32 -0600 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: *myth, also probably quite naive*, T, partic juxtaposed with the notion (unchallenged, below,) that whatever jt 'say[s] is important'..   E.g, thinkin' out loud again, why would her thought process be less or un-'important' on film?   On Fri, 29 Oct 2004 12:46:55 -0400 Terry Clifton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Hughes Jonathan wrote: Judy, what you write on this forum is anything but balanced.  However, what you say is important and it invites forum attendees to draw their own conclusions.  This is exactly why Bush's Brain is an important film.   Jonathan Hughes   *There are no important films.* Terry