Re: [TruthTalk] The Gospel

[Lance Muir]

Speaking for myself, I got it. Yes maaaam! ----- Original Message ----- From: ShieldsFamily To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: November 16, 2004 12:15 Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] The Gospel Since you jumped in on this, John, let me explain that I find it frustrating that almost every time someone tries to discuss something with either you, Lance, or Jonathan one of you jumps in to defend him (or more likely attack the person directly) before there is any answer from the person who was addressed.  This seems very immature and/or rude.  I�m sure you can all carry on a discussion without having someone jump in to answer for you. It makes the discussion very hard to follow because it is immediately diffused into splinter discussions, which results in nothing. The whole discussion is ruined; which may in fact be your motive.  Can you apprehend my meaning here guys??? Izzy   From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 2004 10:14 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] The Gospel   In a message dated 11/16/2004 8:09:41 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Lance, You seem to be developing the bad habit of interrupting the conversation between others just to be negative. Izzy As Judy used to say  --  it is a public list.   "Interruption" is impossible.   You want it to be private, then make it so.    There can be no expectation of privacy on a public forum. John