How many times have I asked of you to narrow your responses to my posts? Including the entire post as a reference is not the problem, as I see it. It is the involvement of the response.
We have opposite viewpoints here, John. I hate reading again posts that I had read before. Only enough should be quoted to remind someone the gist of the previous post that is being responded to. I enjoy seeing someone take time to make a lengthy response where they fully explain what they are trying to say. I generally do not like short responses that you and Lance make because they are so ambiguous and can be understood many different ways.
I have been attempting to limit my responses to you, but I do not limit my responses to others because others tell me they prefer the longer explanations.
Peace be with you.
David Miller.
---------- "Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you ought to answer every man." (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org
If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.
