From: "David Miller" <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Lance
wrote:
> > I used to think that you had 'broader' exposure
theologically.
> > You've helped me see that this is not so. I shall
attempt
> > to factor this in during future posts.
>
> I
have never had a religion class, and my reading these days is somewhat
>
limited in regards to theology. My interest is stronger towards
reading
> church history than reading theological systems. I do
not have a high
> regard for most theologians in the post scientific
revolution age because
of
> the fruit I see coming from them. I
rely on guys like you and Bill Taylor
> to help inform me in these
areas. :-) Meanwhile, I keep my nose in the
> Scriptures above
all, and all other books are secondary to me.
>
> David Miller
wrote:
> >> Do you mean that the covenant is only binding on one
party
> >> to the covenant and that it cannot be broken by anyone
but
> >> the initiator of the covenant? Do you mean that the
covenant
> >> exists and is in force no matter what the other
parties to the
> >> covenant do?
>
> Lance
wrote:
> > Yes.
>
> Then do you consider every one of
Abraham's physical descendants to be
still
> in covenant with God
through this Abrahamic covenant?
>
> And I will make thee
exceeding fruitful, and I will make nations of thee,
> and kings shall
come out of thee. And I will establish my covenant between
> me and thee
and thy seed after thee in their generations for an
everlasting
>
covenant, to be a God unto thee, and to thy seed after thee.
> (Genesis
17:6-7)
>
> Peace be with you.
> David
Miller.
>
>
> ----------
> "Let your speech be always
with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may
know how you ought to answer
every man." (Colossians 4:6)
http://www.InnGlory.org>
> If
you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and
you will be unsubscribed. If you have a
friend who wants to join,
tell him to send an e-mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and he
will be subscribed.
