|
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of ShieldsFamily wrote: Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Toward a
(biblical) Unilateral Covenant Dear Dr. Laura, Apparently
I am the only one who finds this piece of
work (which I have received before via email) to be an
abhorrent mocking of God and His word. Izzy Why wouldyou consider this to be mocking God? I
see it as evidence that no one today no longer
relevant, His laws against sodomy are irrelevant. And that’s a good
point— if you
don’t believe in keeping ALL of God’s laws, how do you pick and
choose? Izzy
|
- RE: [TruthTalk] Toward a (biblical) Unilateral Covenant ShieldsFamily
- Re: [TruthTalk] Toward a (biblical) Unilateral Covenant Jeff Powers
- Re: [TruthTalk] Toward a (biblical) Unilateral Covenant ShieldsFamily
- Re: [TruthTalk] Toward a (biblical) Unilateral Cove... Jeff Powers
- RE: [TruthTalk] Toward a (biblical) Unilateral ... ShieldsFamily
- RE: [TruthTalk] Toward a (biblical) Unilate... Slade Henson
- Re: [TruthTalk] Toward a (biblical) Unilateral Cove... Terry Clifton
- RE: Re: [TruthTalk] Toward a (biblical) Unilate... Slade Henson
- RE: [TruthTalk] Toward a (biblical) Unilateral ... ShieldsFamily
- Re: [TruthTalk] Toward a (biblical) Unilate... David Miller
- RE: [TruthTalk] Toward a (biblical) Un... ShieldsFamily
- [TruthTalk] Off Topic David Miller
- RE: [TruthTalk] Off Topic ShieldsFamily

