No one hates David Miller more than g, I believe. This has never changed in the many years I have been on TT. You can always count on him to come out and strike at any opportunity. (He’s just about as fond of me.) Izzy

 


From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lance Muir
Sent: Saturday, December 04, 2004 11:06 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] American Indians

 

Please leave off making questionable comments as to David's prophetic office. I solicited this information. David responded candidly (with a concern on his part). Cool it G!, please?

----- Original Message -----

Sent: December 04, 2004 11:43

Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] American Indians

 

On Sat, 4 Dec 2004 11:09:04 -0500 "David Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> ..propaganda spewed out about the American Indians.[..]
makes it imperative to view them as enemies--which you said you do..see, the propaganda works well in materialzg your 'manifest destiny'; Rush's perspectiv, germane to this ongoing critq--quotd earlier in th week--defines your 'attitude/s' , a concept Lance pointd out today, wisely..

 

[also - thx Lance; to summarize and move ahead here, as abov, 'manifest destiny' is certainly a factor in (David's acceptance/production of ) Am. propaganda, not only about Indians, but about prophecy...also, apparently, his personal 'manifest destiny' lies in his 'prophetic office' devlopg the propaganda of prophecy--covering his tracks through history]

 

(and, slade: 'ff.' is an acceptd abrev for 'following'--you may have figurd it out or been informd by now--regardless, there's a list of such abbreviations somewhere, e.g., at innglory.org..and, givn my horrid typg, abbreviatd style, feel free to ask about this stuff:)

 

G

 

Reply via email to