ftr, i think the author prov
On Sat, 4 Dec 2004 19:58:46 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
BT, The ensuing speculatg abt v. 17 (Gen 15), refd below, may be correct--it could be abt a unilatrl deal beyond litrl 'descendants'; howevr, the 'diaolog' in Gen 15:18 may have nothing to do with it--v.18 may be anothr 'deal' involvg just Abe's litrl 'descendants', a deal which is actually bi-latrl..well, perhaps someone (who ain't too 'smart') needs to argue for the unity of vss. up to 17 and 18ff.:)On Sat, 20 Nov 2004 09:32:08 -0700 "Bill Taylor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:(v. 17). Two parties passed through the pieces, but neither of them was Abraham.
