DAVID -- Not all rationalists. I have argued this with many scientists on strictly a rational level.
SLADE -- Can you name an Evolutionist who is not a rationalist? I personally can't, but you may have data I lack. DAVID -- I'm not sure "prove" is the correct word choice here, but do you believe that the fossil record supports Creation on a logical and rational basis, or on an illogical basis? I consider the fossil record to be one of the strongest logical evidences for the concept of Creation and so have many other rationalists besides me. SLADE -- Yes. PROVE is not the correct word here in reference to Creation. Nor is it the correct word in reference to Evolution because the fossil record makes the theory of Evolution improbable. DAVID -- There is nothing about miracles that must be inherently illogical. Just because we lack an understanding of it does not mean that we have to conclude that there is no way to understand it. All we need is more information about it to understand how these things work. Scientists can give example after example of things that previously were attributed to "God" because of a lack of knowledge that now we have very logical understandings about. SLADE -- That does not address the issue. Miracles are inherently illogical. All you're addressing is lack of knowledge. The Law of Entropy contradict resurrection and restoration. It is illogical. ---------- "Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you ought to answer every man." (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.
