Depends upon what kind of purpose you have in life. To be like Bart and Jerry, or Jesus.

 


From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lance Muir
Sent: Thursday, December 16, 2004 5:36 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] The Right Way To Get To The Truth

 

Both are better than 'The Purpose-Driven Life'

----- Original Message -----

Sent: December 16, 2004 06:18

Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] The Right Way To Get To The Truth

 

And people of the same ilk watch them all. J

 


From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lance Muir
Sent: Thursday, December 16, 2004 4:59 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] The Right Way To Get To The Truth

 

I believe Seinfeld lived in Manhattan which was not far from Springfield. Elaine, George, Kramer and Newman used to drop in on Homer, Marge, Lisa, and Bart from time. Morality was, in fact, what they had in common. 

----- Original Message -----

Sent: December 15, 2004 20:06

Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] The Right Way To Get To The Truth

 

It was worse than risque’ in my (conservative, of course) opinion.  It was downright degenerate.  I thought it was so funny at first, but had to quit watching a show that promoted such loose sexual morals (too awful to discuss here). I heard Seinfeld and co-stars bragging on Oprah that they had a reputation for pushing the envelope on what TV would allow on primetime programming.  I suppose the audience didn’t “get it” because it was so descriptive of the real lifestyles of the unsaved young singles today—totally devoid of meaning. If Seinfeld failed to make his point it could be that the stories offered no moral alternative.  At least the Simpson’s have a “moral to the story” (from what I recall).  Izzy

 

Reply via email to