Thanks, Slade. I think I’ll
compile them into a best-seller. J Now if you would
please go back and put together a composite of all the ugly names I have been
called by Jonathan alone, that would make a case for ad homenim attacks.
Izzy
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Slade Henson
Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 2004
8:23 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk]
Intentional sin -- the Judas factor
From: Lance Muir
Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 2004
5:39 AM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk]
Intentional sin -- the Judas factor
IZZY STATES: Suits
me, Lance. However, Slade is the one who was critical of my posts.
First he says he didn’t mean the actual posts I sent the day he was
criticizing me, and then he said he only meant the posts I sent prior to the
election, and then he said he was too burdened down to produce proof from
either. My point is made. The girl from Missouri is satisfied. Izzy
SLADE REPLIES: Before I
begin, I want to express some things. There is no malice intended in this post.
I merely show how "The Liberals" are maligned in Izzy's posts.
When/if you read these following posts (some of which are taken "out of
context" because context is too long) you will see a "hatred"
for "liberal ideals." That's not a problem. The problem is then she
pins the "liberal" moniker on TT participants. Can there be any
wonder why there is tension between the "liberals" on TT and the
"conservatives?" It's not a strange step forward to say, "Izzy hates liberal ideals, she calls
me liberal, therefore she hates me." To think
otherwise is to be deceived.
This is one
reason I try to remove myself from most political talk on TT. Like Izzy, I
cannot remove my political life from my Spiritual life. Like Izzy, they're
entwined together within me... they're "echad" (One).
Well, Izzy. Here
we go. In my original post to DavidM, I said, "In fact,
your wording below seems to be maligning Jonathan's character in the same
way Jonathan's maligned Izzy's, and Izzy with 'The Liberals.'" DavidM
explained that he wasn't maligned Jonathan's character while you responded as
if I attacked you. You, by all rights, can interpret what I wrote as an attack,
but I actually was comparing your posts "Against the Liberals" (see
below) with David's post against Jonathan.
Going through
archives carries a curse... a curse showing that I'm the cast iron kettle
calling the pot black. Going through archives also carries a
blessing... how is Ben David Zumbehl doing? When I first read the
post in October, I thought you wrote it wrong, like the first name was
missing... for instance, Slade ben David (Ben meaning "son of."
Funny, eh?
Well, you wanted proof... and here it is.
I hope you'll be satisfied..........
-----Original Message-----
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of ShieldsFamily
Sent: Friday, 19 November, 2004
13.54
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] A
Bookseller's 'wish'
I do see liberals as those who stand against
everything I believe. And they do.
-----Original Message-----
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of ShieldsFamily
Sent: Tuesday, 02 November, 2004
22.00
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] A Rabbi's
love affair with American evangelicals
At least he recognizes his friends, unlike our Liberal Jewish folk.
Izzy
-----Original
Message-----
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of ShieldsFamily
Sent: Tuesday, 05 October, 2004
09.34
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] cheater?
Lance, If I am in “bondage” it
is to Christ only. What I do that looks so “left” to you is
that I walk in the freedom and joy of love and obedience to Christ. (I
even love you—imagine that!
J ) Izzy
-----Original Message-----
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of ShieldsFamily
Sent: Monday, 04 October, 2004
10.51
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] cheater?
Judy, I have
found that when something makes NO sense in the natural, look into the
supernatural. Those who have an unreasoning hatred for anything good (ie:
America,
GWB, Conservatism, the gospel of the Cross) do a reason that they don’t
even comprehend themselves, if you get my drift. Izzy
-----Original Message-----
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of ShieldsFamily
Sent: Wednesday, 06 October, 2004
18.14
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Read it
and weep!
Typical liberal comment. Typically typical.
-----Original Message-----
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of ShieldsFamily
Sent: Wednesday, 06 October, 2004
09.36
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Read it
and weep!
Exactly right,
Judy. Why am I detecting a certain anti-Bible slant now from our
“not liberal” friends? Izzy
-----Original
Message-----
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of ShieldsFamily
Sent: Wednesday, 06 October, 2004
04.04
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Read it
and weep!
Have the liberal theologians convinced you that the
Bible is not really pertinent, or the Holy Spirit’s understanding? Do you
think that those who do not have the Holy Spirit’s indwelling can
understand the Bible? Are you sure you are born again and have received
the Holy Spirit?
-----Original
Message-----
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of ShieldsFamily
Sent: Sunday, 03 October, 2004
11.31
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Read it
and weep!
This does not mean that we are free to draw our
own conclusions in opposition to scripture—we must still keep our
theology within scriptural boundaries. This is not problematical for those who
don’t want to explain away scriptures they don’t agree with to form
doctrines of men. We do not have a “living, breathing” Bible, as
the liberals claim about our Constitution. Izzy
-----Original Message-----
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of ShieldsFamily
Sent: Thursday, 18 November, 2004
09.56
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk]
Repentance
Lance your question WAS: Are you confident that the 'translation' is by
Ryrie as opposed to the 'notes'? Ryrie
changes the text (not just his notes) to support his liberal bias. Izzy
-----Original Message-----
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of ShieldsFamily
Sent: Wednesday, 17 November, 2004
19.14
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk]
Repentance
Ryrie is a liberal
translation of the Bible. No wonder you like it.
-----Original
Message-----
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of ShieldsFamily
Sent: Friday, 29 October, 2004
10.41
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [TruthTalk] Ronald Reagan
Quotes
Some pithy words from
former President Reagan:
"The trouble with our liberal friends is not
that they're
ignorant:
It's just that they know so much that isn't so." - Ronald
Reagan
-----Original Message-----
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of ShieldsFamily
Sent: Monday, 29 November, 2004
12.58
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] The
Schizophrenic God
I don’t hate liberals, but do despise what the
political/religious agenda has done to America’s
society and churches. (Keep in mind that I live in a nest of
“churches” where the sodomites go to “worship” and have
“communion”—a complete travesty.) As I stated before, my best
friend is a liberal, and we love each other dearly. (2) I find that
arguing about ever-smaller bits of information (like evidence that America
has been damaged by the liberal agenda, for example) only leads to
ever-deepening disagreements and nit-picking, and getting entirely away from
the big picture and main points.
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On
Behalf Of ShieldsFamily
Sent: Sunday, 28 November, 2004
10.11
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] The
Schizophrenic God
Same difference as far as I can tell: just
liberals wanting to change the original meaning by rationalizing that it needs
to chance to keep up with the times so to speak.
-----Original
Message-----
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of ShieldsFamily
Sent: Sunday, 28 November, 2004
10.02
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] The
Schizophrenic God
Excuse me if I’m still a bit
skeptical when you use the words “open dynamic theology”,
John. This is exactly the type of wording the liberal Supreme Court
judges use when they want to change (read: trash) the original meaning of our
“living, breathing” United States Constitution. (Ever notice
that?) Izzy
-----Original Message-----
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of ShieldsFamily
Sent: Saturday, 04 December, 2004
17.03
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Trapped
in the Flag
What about all
the liberal mouth-movements about valuing diversity? God made people in all
different forms, shapes, sizes, colors, nationalities (which are WONDERFUL-God
forbid “globalism”!), etc, etc. And that’s just the
human beings!!!
-----Original Message-----
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of ShieldsFamily
Sent: Wednesday, 01 December, 2004
15.23
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Trapped
in the Flag
It was forwarded to me by a PhD scientist who is a
liberal Jew who hates all things conservative.
-----Original Message-----
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of ShieldsFamily
Sent: Tuesday, 30 November, 2004
19.29
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Trapped
in the Flag
Then you just disqualified yourself, since if I am
conservative, you are liberal. (BTW, you never told me what word I should
use, as that one seems to raise hackles with you guys.)
-----Original Message-----
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of ShieldsFamily
Sent: Thursday, 18 November, 2004
09.54
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Two
Covenants
Ah, yes…the liberals continue to
pile on
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On
Behalf Of ShieldsFamily
Sent: Thursday, 21 October, 2004
21.08
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] What is
sin?
This is the problem I have with liberal Christians: they
just cannot
quote chapter and verse to support their claims: because their claims are not
specifically in there. They just say, "Go read Galatians"
assuming you will infer the same things that they are. And if you don't
they assume the problem in yours (not theirs). Izzy
-----Original Message-----
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of ShieldsFamily
Sent: Saturday, 13 November, 2004
08.09
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Who's Who
of the Bible?
My very best girlfriend is a liberal Jew.
-----Original Message-----
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of ShieldsFamily
Sent: Friday, 15 October, 2004
08.49
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Why Bush
is Still Standing
Exactly. Lizard brains are only
required for liberals.
-----Original
Message-----
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of ShieldsFamily
Sent: Friday, 15 October, 2004
10.24
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Why Bush
is Still Standing
Funny thing I forgot to mention on this
post: Last night as I watched TV news footage of Kerry speaking I said out
loud, “Lizard—he looks like a lizard!” I swear on the
Bible that’s exactly what I said. Today I see the lizard brains
commentary on TT. The Lord works in wonderful ways. J Izzy
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of ShieldsFamily
Sent: Wednesday, 06 October, 2004 17.43
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] WorldNetDaily: Uncle Sam will soon want your kids Jonathan,
you have been duped into believing Liberal propaganda machine again.
This email was part of a concerted email scare tactic sent out for that
very reason--to dupe the uninformed.
-----Original Message-----
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of ShieldsFamily
Sent: Monday, 27 September, 2004
16.32
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Pat
Buchanan
Face it Jonathan—ANYONE who bashes
Bush is on your to-read list. Buchanan is as far Right as Kerry is Left. Izzy
-----Original Message-----
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of ShieldsFamily
Sent: Friday, 24 September, 2004
16.28
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Who to
Vote for, and WHY?
YOU ARE JUST AS BLIND AS YOU CLAIM OTHERS
ARE. READ THEM YOURSELF. YOU HAVE NO FACTS TO SUPPORT YOUR
“SICKENINGLY SELECTIVE” VIEWPOINT. THIS WHOLE CONVERSATION
MAKES ME FEEL DISGUSTED. HAVE A GOOD TIME ACTING LIKE KERRY: NOTHING BUT
BAD NEWS FROM YOU. GET A LIFE. IZZY
-----Original Message-----
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of ShieldsFamily
Sent: Thursday, 23 September, 2004
09.12
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Who to
Vote for, and WHY?
You are speaking to a nurse who is married
to a doctor (who by the way does a lot of “research”). I
think I know how to “research”. I love the way you
accuse others of “indoctrination”. Reminds me of a story
about a splinter and a log….Izzy PS I’m not interested in
“human rights”. I’m interested in what God says is
right. That’s why I’m on The Right.
-----Original Message-----
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of ShieldsFamily
Sent: Wednesday, 22 September,
2004 14.44
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Who to
Vote for, and WHY?
I’m VERY sure that we MUST have a
Republican House, Senate, and President to help us overthrow the liberals who
are re-writing the Constitution
-----Original Message-----
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of ShieldsFamily
Sent: Wednesday, 22 September,
2004 14.29
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Dan
Rather Biased
I have never, ever, ever like Dan
Blather. Everyone knows what liberal bias he has. Izzy
-----Original
Message-----
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of ShieldsFamily
Sent: Wednesday, 22 September,
2004 11.53
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Dan
Rather
I agree; this liberal trend of untruth in
journalism is the biggest threat to American freedom. Izzy
-----Original Message-----
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of ShieldsFamily
Sent: Wednesday, 22 September,
2004 09.12
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Dan
Rather
Such liberal nonsense.
-----Original Message-----
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of ShieldsFamily
Sent: Saturday, 18 September, 2004
19.21
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] 9/11
overview
...I guess that’s why liberals dislike him
-----Original Message-----
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of ShieldsFamily
Sent: Monday, 13 September, 2004
18.01
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] 9/11
overview
More leftist insults. War is war.
I’d rather kill a terrorist than kiss his um-hum. Iz
-----Original
Message-----
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of ShieldsFamily
Sent: Monday, 13 September, 2004
09.32
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] 9/11
overview
that is another typical liberal tactic
Another liberal term conservatives
don’t like.
Whenever I try to get you or Lance (or any
liberal) to explain SPECIFICALLY why you believe the way you do about a
SPECIFIC issue, you resort to name-calling.
I have never heard [you] to slander or castigate a liberal
Democrat. Why is that?
-----Original Message-----
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of ShieldsFamily
Sent: Monday, 13 September, 2004
09.32
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk]
Administration Pressure
Oh here we go again: typical liberal “global” attacks on America.
Golly, where do we start to defend ourselves? Read another book from your
liberal library—right! I know your gamebook by heart. If you cannot
bring up ONE issue and defend it YOURSELF, it ain’t worth a pile of poop
-----Original Message-----
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of ShieldsFamily
Sent: Sunday, 12 September, 2004
21.07
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] 9/11
overview
From what I’ve seen of liberals,
they call evil good and good evil. (ie: homosexuality, abortion, anti-war
even for defense of country, anti-repentance gospel, anti-conservative
politics, etc, etc, etc.
That is because you hate to hear anything
good about GWB. You dismiss it as “worship”—another
characteristic liberal insult used by many.
Then why do you hate Conservative politics
in America? Do
the liberal Democrats try to protect the unborn? You are double-minded
-----Original Message-----
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of ShieldsFamily
Sent: Saturday, 11 September, 2004
23.02
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] 9/11
overview
Because they are all written by liberals,
which means slanderers and insulters with no real evidence to
discuss—only nasty, baseless, biased allegations
-----Original Message-----
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of ShieldsFamily
Sent: Friday, 10 September, 2004
19.24
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] 9/11
overview
Please refrain from posting liberal
propaganda on TT. Izzy
-----Original
Message-----
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of ShieldsFamily
Sent: Wednesday, 08 September,
2004 09.32
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Kruger
John, High church has no scripture?
Perhaps that’s why I have a low opinion of them. Perhaps that is
why they are so liberal and out there—with no basis in scripture,
it’s all tradition and ritual. (Gag me with a spoon.) It’s a style??? Since when is lack of
scriptural basis for one’s faith in Christ called “style”?
-----Original Message-----
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of ShieldsFamily
Sent: Saturday, 04 September, 2004
15.44
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] The End
of Truthtalk
Because conservatism stands for everything
real Believers believe in
-----Original Message-----
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of ShieldsFamily
Sent: Saturday, 04 September, 2004
15.43
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] fyi~g ::
"Heads in the Sand"
g, please resist the urge to post liberal
political proganda. I’d hate to have to snow you with the
conservative other side of the story
-----Original Message-----
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of ShieldsFamily
Sent: Saturday, 04 September, 2004
08.54
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] The End
of Truthtalk
g, all these are why God is politically
conservative by the way
-----Original Message-----
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of ShieldsFamily
Sent: Friday, 03 September, 2004
10.09
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] The End
of Truthtalk
All I hear is liberal static….I
can’t heeeeeeeeeeear you!!! Izzy
-----Original
Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On
Behalf Of ShieldsFamily
Sent: Tuesday, 31 August, 2004
18.51
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] from
O'Reilley to you
How many years back do you America
haters have to go to justify your liberal indoctrination?
-----Original Message-----
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of ShieldsFamily
Sent: Tuesday, 31 August, 2004
00.42
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] from
O'Reilley to you
The Left has demonized itself. I
refuse to compromise with that evil. Have you ever studied the French
Revolution? Those were Leftists who forbade any religion and ruled with the
guillotine. They have not changed since then. Read what they did and you will
find the agenda eerily similar today. I have never seen such demonic hatred
towards Believers and righteousness as I see in Leftists today.
The “sins of the Right” do NOT
include mass genocide of the unborn—the rest is small potatoes compared
to that. You and Lance bring up ridiculous charges which are never ever ever
documented or followed through to a logical conclusion. I cannot take any of
your predictable charges seriously because you show no ability to intelligently
discuss a single issue. You just throw out insults and think that is an
intelligent argument. I am bored with your blanket insults.
I am not going to start throwing insults
back and forth—which is all I have seen to date from the Lefties on TT
-----Original Message-----
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of ShieldsFamily
Sent: Wednesday, 25 August, 2004
09.35
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Romans
2:12-16
John, you keep calling
yourself, now, a fundamentalist liberal. Isn’t that an oxymoron? Iz
-----Original Message-----
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of ShieldsFamily
Sent: Tuesday, 24 August, 2004
22.42
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Smithson
and Kruger
You stop attacking things I care about and
I’ll stop calling you a big Liberal—how’s that??? Izzy
-----Original
Message-----
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of ShieldsFamily
Sent: Tuesday, 24 August, 2004
16.28
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Smithson
and Kruger
That’s the biggest liberal lie going
around today. It was “right wing” Christians who fought against
slavery, who got the vote for women, and who currently send more aid to the
needy than all the big-talking “We Are the World” Libs put together
-----Original Message-----
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of ShieldsFamily
Sent: Tuesday, 24 August, 2004
16.01
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Smithson
and Kruger
Liberal baloney. You must be reading
those liberal revisionist history books again. Iz
-----Original
Message-----
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of ShieldsFamily
Sent: Tuesday, 24 August, 2004
15.09
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Smithson
and Kruger
As far as Iraq,
I already knew that you would rather let evil fester there while we talk about
World Peace (which strictly is a Liberal viewpoint)
-----Original
Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On
Behalf Of ShieldsFamily
Sent: Tuesday, 24 August, 2004
11.49
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Smithson
and Kruger
Lance, Kindly tell me how you think you actually
differ from a liberal. (This will be interesting.) Izzy
-----Original
Message-----
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of ShieldsFamily
Sent: Tuesday, 24 August, 2004
10.43
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [TruthTalk] Christians'
authority over nature (Romans 1.12-16)
I think you hate us because you are a
Liberal; not because you are Canadian. There are American Liberals who hate
America/Patriotism/Conservatism/Morality/Family Values/President Bush, too,
believe it or not
-----Original Message-----
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of ShieldsFamily
Sent: Saturday, 21 August, 2004
14.48
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] WHAT IS
SIN?
Don’t feel bad about that, jt.
Liberals think the US Consitution is a “living, breathing” document
as well (so they can change the original intent/meaning of it as well as the
Bible’s.) Izzy
-----Original Message-----
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of ShieldsFamily
Sent: Thursday, 19 August, 2004
09.18
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Thanks
and Praise
No, that is only a requirement for liberals
-----Original Message-----
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of ShieldsFamily
Sent: Wednesday, 28 July, 2004
10.33
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk]
Perichoresis
Jt, I’m no great defender most of
the ideas of our Liberal friends, as you well know
-----Original Message-----
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of ShieldsFamily
Sent: Thursday, 22 July, 2004 09.08
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] WOW!
Izzy points out: 3000
civilians were killed on 9/11—but that doesn’t matter to a Liberal.
Why don’t FACTS
matter to Liberals ???
But you persist because a
Liberal cannot repress his hatred of America
for very long. Your politics means more to you than hurting us.
Hatred is truly a Liberal
value
-----Original Message-----
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of ShieldsFamily
Sent: Wednesday, 21 July, 2004
19.10
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Jonathan
on the question at hand:M vs C
And you
belittle GWBush for the way he communicates?
Is hypocrisy a Liberal value? Izzy
-----Original Message-----
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of ShieldsFamily
Sent: Wednesday, 07 July, 2004
21.59
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk]
Interesting Article
This shows
the prevailing Liberal attitude towards politically Conservative Christians: http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=39321
-----Original
Message-----
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of ShieldsFamily
Sent: Wednesday, 07 July, 2004
21.29
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Hypocrisy
you choose to
believe the worst about a man who has NO verifiable lies (other than the
prevailing liberal OPINION),
-----Original Message-----
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of ShieldsFamily
Sent: Tuesday, 22 June, 2004 13.28
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Who hates
America?
Thanks,
Jonathan. I’m afraid I don’t waste my time reading liberal
dogma. Garbage in = Garbage out. Izzy
-----Original Message-----
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of ShieldsFamily
Sent: Thursday, 17 June, 2004
17.21
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] While we
snooze
That because Rush has to keep up on
all the Liberal baloney they put out every week. It’s his JOB (poor guy!)
-----Original Message-----
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of ShieldsFamily
Sent: Thursday, 17 June, 2004
07.24
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] While we
snooze
Only LIBERALS
watch or take seriously anything on 60 Minutes.
As usual, the Liberals only have “Bad News”,
which is why they are so impotent when it comes to improving the world.
Typical Liberal
answer: “Talk about World Peace.”
this is just
more vague liberal gobbledygook
-----Original Message-----
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of ShieldsFamily
Sent: Tuesday, 15 June, 2004 15.05
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] President
George Bush
whenever
Liberals are too inarticulate to articulate what, specifically, they
don’t like about GWB, they accuse HIM of being “inarticulate”.
And whenever they are unable to intelligently discuss exactly why they disagree
with his policies, they call HIM “stupid”. Why is it that Liberals avoid discussing ISSUES, and instead
ATTACK those that they disagree with? Is this living according to the Law
of Love? Izzy
-----Original Message-----
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
ShieldsFamily
Sent: Tuesday, 15 June, 2004 09.32
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] President George
Bush
That's the whole problem with Liberals.
They prefer immorality. Of course,that's all they have to choose from. Izzy
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
ShieldsFamily
Sent: Monday, 14 June, 2004 18.41
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] President George Bush
If you only watch the biased Liberal media, you will only get a
biased view of GWBush
-----Original Message-----
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of ShieldsFamily
Sent: Wednesday, 09 June, 2004
16.27
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Mediation
of Christ -- the real vs false
You are a real
piece of liberal work. Izzy
-----Original
Message-----
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of ShieldsFamily
Sent: Wednesday, 09 June, 2004
15.53
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk]
Trustworthy?
G, you only
continue to prove how malignant liberal thinking is
-----Original Message-----
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of ShieldsFamily
Sent: Tuesday, 08 June, 2004 10.34
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk]
Americans, Canadians, Lions, Tigers, Oh My!
liberals prove
themselves repeatedly to stand for every wrong thing politcally. And to
justify their beliefs they create a fictitious Jesus who has no standards, and
embraces every form of evil doing
