RE: [TruthTalk] Intentional sin -- the Judas factor

[ShieldsFamily]

Your opinion, IMO.  J (Judge a tree by its fruit.) Iz   From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lance Muir Sent: Monday, December 20, 2004 11:07 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Intentional sin -- the Judas factor   They aren't. Like I said, God is gracious. ----- Original Message ----- From: ShieldsFamily To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: December 20, 2004 11:48 Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Intentional sin -- the Judas factor   They could certainly be mutually related. Iz   From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lance Muir Sent: Monday, December 20, 2004 9:24 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Intentional sin -- the Judas factor   My guess and, what more could it be, is that you are correct on both counts 1. David is locked into the past 2. More of HK has been illumined through him than me. These two things are not mutually exclusive.    ----- Original Message ----- From: ShieldsFamily To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: December 20, 2004 10:06 Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Intentional sin -- the Judas factor     ======================================================= Too bad, David.  Your version of the Gospel is obsolete.  Modern man cannot connect with your message.   Guess I may as well go crawl in a hole and die.  I am even obsoleeeeeter than you. :-) Terry   I wonder how many people have been saved and entered the Kingdom of God via David’s “obsolete” theology vs how many have entered via Lance, et al’s ??? Izzy