RE: [TruthTalk] So Long David Miller, and Thanks for the Fish

[ShieldsFamily]

Dallas Willard, The Divine Conspiracy (1997):               “It is tempting in such a project to enter the conflict—long standing and currently at the boiling point—about the accessibility of the ‘real’ Jesus and his words to us now.  Because I do not do so, I will assume that it was produced and preserved by competent human beings who were at least as intelligent and devout as we are today. I assume that they were quite capable of accurately interpreting their own experience and of objectively presenting what they heard and experienced in the language of their historical community, which we today can understand with due diligence.             On the divine side, I assume that God has been willing and competent to arrange for the Bible, including its record of Jesus, to emerge and be preserved in ways that will secure his purposes for it among human beings worldwide. Those who actually believe in God will be untroubled by this. I assume that he did not and would not leave his message to humankind in a form that can only be understood by a handful of late-twentieth-century professional scholars, who cannot even agree among themselves on the theories that they assume to determine what the message is.             The Bible is, after all, God’s gift to the world through his Church, not to the scholars. It comes through the life of his people and nourishes that life. Its purpose is practical, not academic. An intelligent, careful, intensive but straightforward reading—that is one not governed by obscure and faddish theories or by a mindless orthodoxy—is what it requires to direct us into life in God’s kingdom. Any other approach to the Bible, I believe, conflicts with the picture of the God that, all agree, emerges from Jesus and his tradition.”     From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Slade Henson Sent: Friday, December 24, 2004 10:52 PM To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] So Long David Miller, and Thanks for the Fish   So true, but sadly, the illiterate or the country bumpkin with a 4th-grade education will miss out on some incredible and wow-ing insights gained from deep study in the Hebrew or Greek. Are they necessary? No... that's never been argued to my knowledge (and even if it has, it's not been MY argument). Does Hebrew and Greek create a fuller understanding? Absolutely.   -- slade -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Judy Taylor Sent: Friday, 24 December, 2004 23.18 To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] So Long David Miller, and Thanks for the Fish jt: Thanks for that Terry, my late FIL is a perfect example.  He had a 4th grade education and book learning was definitely not his forte, although he had all kinds of country wisdom.  He could grow things and take care of live stock. He gave his animals shots and sewed up dogs that had been gored by pigs. He was a godly man with a giving heart and the only book in his house was the KJV Bible.  He could read and understand that and he was an influence for God upon all he came in contact with (including me).