In a message dated 12/26/2004 5:16:41 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

: To my way of thinking I have not been majoring on anything "against individuals"
It is their ideas and their theology I am against.  I don't know what you mean by "accusatory tone"
and "accusatory questions" transparent in purpose and weak on substance either. Are you sure
you are not reading more into what I write than what is there?
 
Can you give me an example?.  jht


Refer back to your post to Bill.   Either you see it or not.   I have made my point clearly.   Any further discussion on my part would be argumentative.

John ---  out !!!





Reply via email to