On Mon, 27 Dec 2004 21:56:30 -0700 "Bill Taylor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Judy, Dake is a theologian; you just fail to see that. More importantly, by making that your point you miss the point of my post script: Do you think it would be a good idea to keep private correspondence private? I do. 
 
jt: OK Bill, Dake is a theologian, I'll give that one up. I didn't see him as one because he hasn't written a lot of commentaries and books and did not represent any denomination. I've had that Bible since 1978 but don't read his notes. I use the lists because it's easier than spending a lot of time in Strongs and I do have other things to do. As
for the "private correspondence" issue.  Normally I do keep private correspondence private. However, there was a
sin issue here and this is why it needed to be brought into the light.  I don't want to give the enemy any ground at
all and this time he caught me blindsided.  The fallout hasn't been fun but I'll make it.  The Lord is good.  jt.
 

 
 
On Mon, 27 Dec 2004 21:20:53 -0700 "Bill Taylor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:  Okay. Maybe it is not these things. Hmmmmmmmmmmmmm. I will go stand in the corner for a while.  Bill 
 
PS -- Joking aside, just a small suggestion for your (pl) consideration: It may be best when private correspondence is sent between members that neither member make that correspondence public without the prior consent of the other member. My intent was not to "out" Judy, but to let her know that I knew what she had done and that I thought it inappropriate considering her past stance against the referential use of theology/theologians.
 
jt: Once more Bill; Dakes Notes are NOT theology. I use them as a list of scriptures when they validate what I believe already and yes I was wrong not to list the Bible as a source.  What I have learned through all of this though is how little love there is among those who profess godliness. So many seem to want to get in and lay on another 'stripe' - accusation and condemnation reign.  Is it any wonder people lack vulnerability and openness in Church settings? - they would be eaten alive.  Where is the love that covers the multitude of sin?  judyt
 
What upsets me much more than the fact that you plagiarized -- something we have probably all done at one time or another
-- is the hypocrisy, the deceit, the dishonesty of it all. I hope,

 

Bill, this is NOT something of which one should accuse a Believer, as Believers do NOT do these things

(hypocrisy, the deceit, the dishonesty).  Izzy

 
 

Reply via email to