In a message dated 12/29/2004 2:48:39 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In my quest to learn why this "eternal Son of God" doctrine is considered so "important that it must be an integral part of "those things which are most surely believed among some, even without scriptural foundation" -
No one is being to asked to believe anything, much less to believe apart from biblical foundation. NOTING I believe is "without scriptural foundation."
John
