I sort of agree. 'Those with high interpretive skills need not apply'  Judy, Judy, Judy (my Cary Grant imitation once again), will you kindly explain what underlies the diversity of understandings on TT. Also, why is it that you and Izzie 'use' 'The David' as fall back support if it isn't PARTLY for that which you believe to be his 'high interpretive skills'?  
----- Original Message -----
Sent: January 02, 2005 08:39
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Saved and Born From Above

jt: Lance God does not make His revelation so difficult that people need high interpretive skills.
In fact Paul said he used great plainness of speech [2 Cor 3:12]. So why does your mode of
communication take such energy and such high interpretive skill?.
 
 
On Sun, 2 Jan 2005 07:31:17 -0500 "Lance Muir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
It is NOT safe to so say, David. I think that so-called 'cryptic' posts elude some who do not have much skill at interpretation.
Lance wrote:
> At 'the end' we shall all see the answer to that
> question. 'Surprise' just might be an operative
> word then. I do believe that many are 'born from
> above' who don't even know what that means.
 
I agree with your comment about "surprise," but your answer here is so very reminiscent of our Mormon pal, Dave Hansen, when he was asked on this forum if he was saved.  I can't remember if you were on here at that time, but is it safe for us to consider that you take Dave's position, that you are not saved until the end?
 
Peace be with you.
David Miller.
 

Reply via email to