Re: [TruthTalk] The place of creeds in relation to truth

[Lance Muir]

Some 'openness' theologians speak of such things. John Sanders, Clark Pinnock, Gregory Boyd et al. Further, they go on to speak of God not knowing what you're going to have for supper tonight? ----- Original Message ----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Sent: January 02, 2005 11:16 Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] The place of creeds in relation to truth In a message dated 1/2/2005 3:28:07 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: 'Houston we have a problem'! 'One should not boast while putting one's armour on' (Kings) See, JD, I too can be mystifying. Now, just what the (garf-this is a Jonathanism) did you mean? ----- Original Message ----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Sent: January 01, 2005 14:51 Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] The place of creeds in relation to truth In a message dated 1/1/2005 9:32:37 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I believe that even had that (unnamed) thingy never occured the Eternal Son would still have Incarnated. What would be your honored opin if I said that because it happened just the way it happened,  there could not have been an alternative history?  Would your comment included any kind of reference to chunky style barnyard   :-) JD J Would you think me full of hot air if I suggested that there may have been no choice for God  .................... that the historical record coupled with the nature of God  (someting I could know more about), believing that He does nothing just for the heck of it, gives us the only activity God could have commited to.  John Junior