In a message dated 1/3/2005 6:53:39 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:



Dang me !!  Let's try Gentile Legalist.    I really need to proof read more carefully. but I get excited, start typing,  and BAM   ------------  
I have fathered another misspelling. 

John




Without a mother??? Izzy



Ahhhhhhhh.    I see your point, now.   Thanks.   "Father," even when applied to the heavenly Whoever, is just a play on words like the one I used above.   Whoa, you got me.   So who is that masked man and the one who sits at His right hand  --   ooooops,  maybe "right hand," and  "sits" are simply manifestations of   .............................. whoever those two or three or four or five persons/people/whatchamacallits.  


What if i called Him  (or her or ?) the Eternal Whatchamacallits   and we can plug in god, father, son, h.g., lord, savior, and the like  --  you know, words that help define the Great Whatchmacallits  (notice the plurality of being)  but have nothing at all to do with his/her nature, essence, existence or purpose.  

Actually, I think I will stay with Almighty and Eternal Father   ----    it sounds so much more reasonable than Whatchamacallits.  

John the bishop of whatever

Reply via email to