|
Actually, slowly once again, I'm coming to
understand that what God MEANS is what you & David say he MEANS. i AM
TEACHABLE, YOU KNOW.
----- Original Message -----
Sent: January 04, 2005 07:25
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Judaizers within
the Messianic Movement
What if I don't believe that God is "open
structured and theologically flexible?" even though He is unwilling for
any to perish and even if His mercy does
endure forever... He don't play - He says what He means and means what He says
so why play fast and loose with His Words.
No Judy, you tell 'em. Remember, he's got a stick
in his hand.
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Judaizers
within the Messianic Movement
Tell that to the man who was out there picking up
sticks on the Sabbath.
I do believe that G_d is more 'open
structured' (read theologically flexible) than most of His
disciples.
I think Slade has his thoughts on it
more "thought out"...does that make sense? He's studied the issue in
depth due to some anti-missionary problems we've run into in the past.
I don't know what Jeff's thoughts are. K.
God is one, Scripture says so. God
has many different aspects or
manifestations....
I still haven't found any reference to trinity in
Scripture. What I truly think is that some dude tried to make God
more understandable to our very limited minds and taught us about
the three in one. Makes sense to me to make a midrash out of
something hard to understand. I'd like to know when the trinity
concept actually came into being with Christians. I know Judaism
has an aspect of it somewhere way back in
time....
Kay
In a
message dated 1/3/2005 1:26:04 PM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Denouncing trinity? I didn't know there was
such a Biblical term in the
first
place.
I think David has a problem
here. If you are not denying God in Trinity by
refusing to consider Christ as the Eternal Son, how
can we say that Messianics deny God the Reality by asserting the
oneness of God?
John
|
