jt: And what in the world are you doing
John?
Are you actually using the "present day grammatical
rules of Hebrew" to interpret God's eternal Word of Truth?
Apparently you don't believe the Holy Spirit is able
to lead us into all truth without these - am I correct?
On Wed, 12 Jan 2005 15:46:29 EST [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Judy, what in the world are you doing?
Are you actually disagreeing with the grammatical rules of Hebrew.
The correct responce to Slade's observation about the very language of the
O.T. is "wow, I didn't know that" or perhpas simply
"cool."
Why are you disagreeing with Slade when you have no idea what you are talking about? John
Why are you disagreeing with Slade when you have no idea what you are talking about? John
jt: I don't know about "fun" Slade. It's serious business to student's of God's Word as it was to the astrologers or whoever they were who travelled so far to see the child Jesus; also to Simeon and Anna. Do you see Isa 9:6,7 as something other than "future" Slade? Should "shall and wil"l be interpreted as present or past tense?
On Tue, 11 Jan 2005 18:40:44 -0500 "Slade Henson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:Hello, Judy. Please understand that there is no past, present, or future tense in the Hebrew Scriptures. We can infer past or present or future by perfect and imperfect tenses, but prophesy...? It breaks a lot of the grammar rules. It can be fun as long as you don't get dogmatic about it.
Only Begotten" means "unique."
-- slade
