I said, for the life of me, I don't get it. I am sorry. You
caught the brunt of my frustration. I have posted numerous times on the
sufficiency of Christ's finished work to save babies the same way he has saved
everyone else, "believers" included. We do not need a
second "gospel" to get those who cannot believe into heaven. Our
problems arise from a deficient view concerning WHO Christ is and what he has
accomplished in our stead and on our behalf. It frustrates me when what I have
said in regards to this is overlooked when the discussion comes up again. No,
it is not your theology, and certainly not all of your theology from just one
post. It is me through and through. Thanks for being gracious and making light
of my comment. Bill Bill, I posted this yesterday and got (as
usual) as resounding non-response. What say you??? Speaking
of such, I am of the opinion (have I ever been taught this???) that we are born
with a propensity to sin—not
actually already condemned by sin (since we haven’t yet). So, in
that case, anyone who dies prior to actually sinning is not under God’s
judgment, and does not go to hell. Is there some scriptural reason for
not believing this anyone? izzy |
- Re: [TruthTalk] Whose Names are Written in the Lambs Book of... ShieldsFamily
- Re: [TruthTalk] Whose Names are Written in the Lambs Bo... Bill Taylor
- RE: [TruthTalk] Whose Names are Written in the Lamb... ShieldsFamily
- RE: [TruthTalk] Whose Names are Written in the Lambs Bo... ShieldsFamily
- Re: [TruthTalk] Whose Names are Written in the Lambs Bo... Bill Taylor
- Re: [TruthTalk] Whose Names are Written in the Lambs Bo... Bill Taylor
- Re: [TruthTalk] Whose Names are Written in the Lambs Bo... Judy Taylor
- Re: [TruthTalk] Whose Names are Written in the Lambs Bo... Bill Taylor
- RE: [TruthTalk] Whose Names are Written in the Lamb... ShieldsFamily