Bill Taylor wrote: > I was under the impression that the Carbon > dating of the "blood" from its bones had given > indication of a fairly recent date (within a few > thousand years).
I am unaware of any carbon dating being done on this specimen. Such a thought would never enter the mind of the evolutionist because carbon dating can't go back further than 50,000 years tops and the evolutionist is already confident that the bones are far older than that. Furthermore, I doubt that there is enough organic material to do such a test. They had to grind the bone for the assays that seemed to indicate the presence of hemoglobin, and I had the impression that they would not have enough material for radiometric dating. Peace be with you. David Miller. ---------- "Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you ought to answer every man." (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.
